#26
Posted: 9/24/14 at 5:10am
I was implying more that Applause and Woman of the Year were bad _shows_ (the former because of its terrible score, the latter because of its horribly dated gender politics), that, apart from Bacall being Bacall in the book scenes (and a good supporting performance here and there), didn't really have much of anything going for them. Even Woman of the Year really only had one song of any consequence. And when you combine the poor quality of the vehicles she was given, and the fact that she clearly had no business attempting any kind of singing career, you kind of get the feeling that a Musical Theater with no Bacall might have been a better, happier Musical Theater all around. Let her stay in the spoken drama that was her natural home, and let her shine at what she was she was genuinely good at, but leave the musical vehicles to the people who were actually qualified for them.
And yes, I think she was a great actress. A great actress with a narrow range, perhaps, but there's no shame in that. She was certainly amazingly good in the kind of characterization she specialized in, and gave a number of legendary-class performances in her career. I'd argue that justifies the superlative 'great actress', even if her thespian versatility gets called into question. It's the equivalent of calling George Abbott a 'Great Director'...on the one hand, he was relatively unadventurous and never achieved the innovations of a Hal Prince or a Bob Fosse, but on the other hand, is anyone actually going to argue with the title?
And yes, I think she was a great actress. A great actress with a narrow range, perhaps, but there's no shame in that. She was certainly amazingly good in the kind of characterization she specialized in, and gave a number of legendary-class performances in her career. I'd argue that justifies the superlative 'great actress', even if her thespian versatility gets called into question. It's the equivalent of calling George Abbott a 'Great Director'...on the one hand, he was relatively unadventurous and never achieved the innovations of a Hal Prince or a Bob Fosse, but on the other hand, is anyone actually going to argue with the title?