LES MIS Cast Complete - Taylor Swift & Amanda Seyfried Offered Roles — Page 4

Anyone see Kate Shindle's twitter?
Kate Shindle:
Oh, come on, it's EPONINE. On a scale zero to Bella Swan, it's about a 5 in difficulty. She'll be fine!

I think she has a point. Eponine is a SMALLER part. I'm hoping that the director gets her to actually act. The singing I'm not too worried about. Their gonna auto tune it anyway so as long as she does not turn it into some country crap (which I'm sure they stop if it gets to that point) and sings the song well and learns how to act I think it will be fine.

---

"It's a Tony-winning role. Just because there have been an endless stream of whiny tweeners playing this part and singing those songs for 25 years doesn't mean there's more to it than that."

Well said.

And for the record, the idea of autotune just makes me puke.

---

MTV posted a photo of what Taylor might look like as Eponine.

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1676711/taylor-swift-les-miserables.jhtml

Updated On: 1/4/12 at 11:38 AM

It's cold out there so her lips are all chapped.

I just want to put it out there I do NOT think Eponine is an easy role. I was just stating that I think I'm going to hold reservation's till I see the movie. But...I'm not holding my breath.

---

Just look at her record sales and you'll feel better.

"It's a Tony-winning role. Just because there have been an endless stream of whiny tweeners playing this part and singing those songs for 25 years doesn't mean there's more to it than that."

There will have to be some strong direction on Hooper's part, but I wouldn't expect a complete trainwreck. I mean, if Eponine was a songwriter, she'd be Taylor Swift. As long as she can read a line naturally, at worst, she won't distract or detract from the rest of the film.

EDIT: And glass half full, we might get another Jennifer Hudson situation, seeing as Taylor is at least as similar to Eponine as Jennifer was to Effie.

Updated On: 1/4/12 at 11:49 AM

^ I agree, MB.

Not to mention when you cast music stars you have record labels to deal with. They have "exclusive" contracts and have to be paid well or paid off. It gets very complicated behind the scenes.

Even Rosemary Clooney in White Christmas couldn't appear on the soundtrack for the film because of her recording contract. Same with Ethel Merman and Call Me Madam. It get's tricky, and sometimes, people won't budge.

I personally hate it when someone incredibly famous (Taylor, at the moment) is cast in something like this, because it's jarring. It will pull everybody right out of the movie. And with a supporting role, you don't have long to win over an audience and pull them into the character and the story again. She has her work cut out for her. The best thing they could do is make her virtually unrecognizable in the role. Take al her makeup off and give her dark hair. Let the movie audience "discover" her in the part, rather than drawing attention to "Taylor Swift" in the role.

Of course they cast her (if It's true!) exactly for that reason. To draw attention.

It's a losing situation, I think.

---

Of COURSE Kate Shindle thinks it's easy. If I could sing like Kate Shindle, vocally it'd be an easy role for me too. If Taylor Swift could sing like Kate Shindle, I wouldn't be worried.

I do like Taylor Swift's voice, actually. But not for Eponine. I don't like Amanda Seyfried's voice, either, it's very thin and fluttery. I don't get how Tom Hooper could make this decision when the casting call said "strong soprano is a must."

Add me to the list of people hoping this is fake.

---

As I am also sadden by this news... I will not judge completely until the movie or clips are released.

But, we have to put on our producers hat. Why were these two offered roles? Simple--the same reason John Travolta was offered Edna in the Hairspray movie. The majority of their investors are most likely (not saying they are) oversea investors that had a popularity in a certain actor(even if the actor is not amazing/right for the role or the public has a pissing contest over it),therefore it makes the most perfect financial/creative sense. Movies are to entertain, but overall to make money. Bottom-line, whatever brings in the money. If the producers and investors felt that somewhere along the line that these two will sell tickets (beyond the already mentioned cast), then they have done their job. Also, if the producers want their movie to be made, then sometimes in order to get funding, sometimes you have to go down a path that is not always the best.

The only way this will backfire is if the public simply does not buy tickets to see the film (which I highly doubt that will happen).

"But not for Eponine. I don't like Amanda Seyfried's voice, either, it's very thin and fluttery. I don't get how Tom Hooper could make this decision when the casting call said "strong soprano is a must."

*Shrugs* Who knows. Maybe they meant strong as in capable, and not strong as in spinto.

But, for me, Seyfried's voice invokes youth, naivety, and inexperience. Elements they might be looking to bring out in this character. Or they just cast her because of her name.

"teeny boppers" Not as many as Swift. Glee isn't "cool."