again, in defense of CATS, it is said over and over again that we are all entitled to our own opinions and this is true so I will say that in my humble opinion to put wicked on the same level, at least textually speaking, as CATS, as one is rather poorly constructed by Winnie Holzman from a fantastic source material by Gregory Maguire, and the other constructed by Trevor Nunn with the source material being these fantastic poems by the late great T.S. Eliot is a bit laughable. CATS is a "spectacle" show in the same vein as wicked (and they both have their "assents") but its text and songs are based on those poems by T.S. Eliot who probably ranks as one of the most important poets of the 1900s, and even these poems which were initially written for children are not even on the same intelligence legal as that of the book to wicked.
and I, of course, admit that CATS is not without flaws. it has many. but, I will say that most of it's flaws are due to the fact that Eliot had passed on and was not able to write any new material. the Eliot estate being, understandably, very cautious about the project was adamant about them only using the words of T.S. Eliot which therefor put a bad on anything that was written that could possibly link the songs together other than the unpublished fragmented poems that Eliot had written almost suggesting an evening of theatre about one special night where a single cat is chosen to go "up, up, up past the Russell hotel and up, up, up to the Hevyside Layer". It is agreed by most that prior to his death Eliot might have had the idea for some kind of abstract evening with these poems already established. the musical can only exist as an incomplete realization of that idea.
Updated On: 5/25/05 at 11:14 AM