Been looking around but with Spider-man hovering, it's the only thing that comes up when you search. Does anybody have a list with production costs? They can be broadway or west end or whatever.
Thanks for the info.
I recently heard that Shrek was one of the most expensive.
No helpful information from me, but an anecdote from a silly woman behind me at Women on the Verge. At intermission she said with disdain, "That is the most money I've ever seen on a stage." Really? This $6 million production is the most expensive-looking production you've ever seen? I can name a number of productions (especially Les Mis and Phantom, which she must have seen at some point) that surely cost more than WOTV.
Broadway Legend Joined: 10/10/08
Shrek is second most expensive at about $25 million.
I'm sure 9 to 5, Wicked, and Spamalot are up there too.
And according to the Times, WOTV cost only $5 million, a number I find mind-boggling especially considering it's only half a million more than Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson. Women on the Verge has a million and a half set changes, giant projection screens, ridiculous moving sets, and a high-profile cast. BBAJ has NO set changes (and a simple set at that), no orchestra, and no stars in the (relatively) small cast.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/28/05
I believe I read somewhere that if you adjust for inflation, the original "Follies" was the most expensive.
Yes, how in the world did Bloody Bloody cost that much? Or Verge cost that "little"? I think Scottsboro Boys also had a budget of $5 million. It would surprise me if that cost the same as Women on the Verge- especially since their theaters have a pretty similar size feel to me.
^ That's correct. If it were done today exactly as it was done in the early 70s, the budget would be somewhere around 80 mil. Those werent cheap costumes by any stretch, the set was a huge affair (actually far more complex than the photos suggest -- check the model at the Library of Performing Arts the next time they bring it out), and it was a pretty massive cast and crew.
Aren't the principals in Women on the Verge making significantly less than they would in a commercial production?
The Scarlet Pimpernel cost somewhere around $18 MIL between the 3 productions. This did however cover one creative team, then a director switch (and updated sets/changes in other design aspects), a 3-city, 3 month premiere tour, and the scaled down production sets and theatre change!
I read in the Spiderman thread that like its un-related movie of the same name, Titanic the musical cost a considerable amount and was regularly sniped at in previews as being DOA. True?
I dont know how well TITANIC did or did not succeed at the box office, but it was pretty high budget... which is one reason why, at the end of the first act, I laughed... perhaps a bit too loudly for the comfort of my b/f.
And while it never made it to Broadway, one of the most expensive works in progress had to be the late 70s BARBARY COAST, which was all sets and costumes and not much else. The story behind that trainwreck is a fascinating one.
True...for the most part.
Wicked cost $14 million
Shrek I heard was upward of $20 million (not sure if thats true)
Titanic was (back in the 90's) over $10 million (perhaps $15 million)
Dance of the Vampires was 30 million. You could really see the money on that stage!
Stand-by Joined: 10/8/10
Stand-by Joined: 2/15/10
How has Lion King not been mentioned?
Yea, you could DEFINITELY see all the money put into DotV when Michael Crawford starts singing in his falsetto while controlling a bat that looked like it was made by a 3rd grader. TOTALLY what they paid $30 mill for...MC ruined that show... :P
Everyone seems to be concentrating on Broadway. The OP stated that (s)he wishes to consider ALL productions.
LORD OF THE RINGS quickly comes to mind.
How much did SUNSET BLVD cost?
LORD OF THE RINGS... another WTF were they thinking? production. I saw it in Toronto and was utterly flabbergasted.
Initial SUNSET BOULEVARD Broadway budget was $13 MIL. They went over almost immediately from the beginning because of the hydraulics and marketing fees, which I believe I read somewhere were triple what the original budget had allowed weekly.
Not to mention many people add the law suits in with that one, which made it cost about $20 MIL. (It did make back way over half of that though!)
Broadway Star Joined: 7/13/04
The REAL question (and only for those that have seen it):
If you saw Spider-Man, without knowing anything about it's history, what would you guess the budget was?
Personally, I would guess it to be a 20 million dollar show, based simply on what you see on stage.
Swing Joined: 6/28/10
If we are going on non Broadway shows, Phantom in Las Vegas has to be up there. I can't find a figure, but I remember it costing somewhere north of $60 million. correct me if I'm wrong.
I thought Miss Saigon came in at around $30 million dollars?
All of this talk of expesive special effect flop brought to mind FRANKENSTEIN
Frankenstein, 1981
The most expensive dramatic production to come to Broadway at the time, Frankenstein lasted just one night at the Palace Theater. Elaborate special effects and a ballooning budget behind extensive scenery (and the huge crew of stagehands to move it all around) made it impossible for the production to withstand a critical panning.
Story about Frankenstein
THE PIRATE QUEEN was pretty pricey, and lost almost all its investment.
My friend said that he would have guessed it looked to be around $30 million if he didnt know any better. But you gotta also look into the stuff ya dont see (actor salaries, royalty fees, backstage hydrolics, ect.)
Videos