ColorTheHours048 said: "jo said: "ColorTheHours048 said: "Calm down, Hugh. Jeez!"
You started it with your outlandish claim! You wouldn't even respect that I have been a member of this message board earlier than you, implying that I am just talking for someone.
"
My “outlandish claim”? Starting with the fact that I didn’t say anything negatively about Hugh Jackman, you’ve got to chill. I don’t care how long you’ve been on this board.
We get it. You love Hugh. Put that aside for a second. Max Clayton was in the rehearsal room consistently, working with Warren, Warren’s associate choreographer, and Hugh when he was there. But when Hugh wasn’t there, Max was, building the material that would later be taught to Hugh. Both by Max and by Warren, etc. This isn’t a dig at Hugh; it’s a fact of working in the theatre, and especially working during the pandemic.
We can have a difference of opinion on whether Max was a successful Harold Hill (I found him almost overwhelmingly charming and lovely in the role from my one time seeing the show), but let’s not let our love of a performer cloud our rationality here. Or our sense of humor, for that matter."
Saying "a role that he built for Hugh Jackman to learn." was in a comic vein? What a weird sense of humor then?
I don't like being talked down to - what love of a performer are you talking about? I admire Hugh Jackman's work but I do know what his strong and weak points are. But your generalization implies that he did not contribute anything substantial to the creation of a role ( such as how to interpret and act out a role or how to interpret and sing a song - we are not talking of someone who is a newbie to the theatre ) was a dig at someone who is the name above the title. It offends my sense of fairness!
I respect other opinions or sharing of knowledge but when fact is being twisted ( because now you are saying that he did assist Warren/Asst- but that was just the dance element)... and not that he also assisted Jerry Zaks and Patrick Vaccariello teaching Hugh how to act and how to sing) - is it unusual to react to your conclusion the way I did?
You were trying to talk down to me - by calling me "Hugh" when I have established my bonafides on this board since 2003. How is that being respectful of your co-members?
You are entitled to your own appreciation of a performer's strengths or weaknesses but let us not conclude that when someone disagrees with you that the person is simply someone who "loves" the performer!
Updated On: 7/22/22 at 12:12 PM