#1
Posted: 9/20/09 at 1:43am
Strangely, I wound up watching that former notorious couple Sienna Miller and Jude Law perform today, in that order. I have to say that I'm somewhere between rOcKs and rdove (the poor potential shill) on Hamlet. Law is great, but Hamlet is LONG and even though I was probably watching at least one Tony-worthy performance here, it stopped just short of reaching out and grabbing me by the throat.
But Sienna Miller in After Miss Julie did exactly that. I disagree with the posters here who were uncomfortable with the long silences in the play, which to my mind, were quite natural and built tension, and especially with the ones who felt that the director probably wasn't looking for laughter in the last 20 minutes of this play. If the director was looking to make me laugh AND make me cry, he succeeded brilliantly, as I veered back and forth between the two while watching the Sienna Miller character self-destruct. How could anyone NOT think they're going for a laugh as when, in between hysterics, Miss Julie fantasizes about living on the East Side, oh no better make that the WEST Side of New York City? In my opinion, ColortheHours is dead-on when he calls this production electric.
In terms of a preview, it was absolutely audience-ready. In terms of Miller, whom I couldn't even remember having seen in a movie, this is the best Broadway debut of a film or TV actress I can remember...in a completely different league than Katie Holmes, Julia Roberts, or even Jennifer Garner, who I thought did a very good job in Cyrano last year.
Hamlet was exactly what I expected, and I give Law credit; he's a brilliant actor. But Miss Julie went above and beyond. I am no shill for Roundabout; after last season, I gave up subscribing and just last week posted here that I thought Bye, Bye Birdie was just embarrassing. So it was especially gratifying--and sorry, I felt the need to do my own thread here!--to see them succeed with this one; and my God, I got to see this for ten bucks?
But Sienna Miller in After Miss Julie did exactly that. I disagree with the posters here who were uncomfortable with the long silences in the play, which to my mind, were quite natural and built tension, and especially with the ones who felt that the director probably wasn't looking for laughter in the last 20 minutes of this play. If the director was looking to make me laugh AND make me cry, he succeeded brilliantly, as I veered back and forth between the two while watching the Sienna Miller character self-destruct. How could anyone NOT think they're going for a laugh as when, in between hysterics, Miss Julie fantasizes about living on the East Side, oh no better make that the WEST Side of New York City? In my opinion, ColortheHours is dead-on when he calls this production electric.
In terms of a preview, it was absolutely audience-ready. In terms of Miller, whom I couldn't even remember having seen in a movie, this is the best Broadway debut of a film or TV actress I can remember...in a completely different league than Katie Holmes, Julia Roberts, or even Jennifer Garner, who I thought did a very good job in Cyrano last year.
Hamlet was exactly what I expected, and I give Law credit; he's a brilliant actor. But Miss Julie went above and beyond. I am no shill for Roundabout; after last season, I gave up subscribing and just last week posted here that I thought Bye, Bye Birdie was just embarrassing. So it was especially gratifying--and sorry, I felt the need to do my own thread here!--to see them succeed with this one; and my God, I got to see this for ten bucks?