NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
#1NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/7/08 at 5:55pm
...on commercial and non-profit productions. Claims that Guys & Dolls has been canceled.
Theatres monitoring Wall Street drama
#2re: NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/7/08 at 7:41pmThe owners & producers have to be crapping their pants about now.
#2re: NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/7/08 at 8:16pmI am very scared, but I honestly cannot say im upset that Guys and Dolls has been cancelled.
#3re: NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/7/08 at 8:19pmNeither am I
Trekkie2
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/7/06
#4re: NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/7/08 at 8:32pmGood thing, too. The idea of a tired Guys and Dolls revival being the Nederlander's first tenant after Rent turns my stomach.
#5re: NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/7/08 at 9:29pmIn retrospect, I wonder if the writer meant Godspell, and not Guys & Dolls?
FindingNamo
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
#6re: NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/7/08 at 11:11pm
I predict Musical Mash-Ups will be the next trend, after Juke Box Musicals.
Coming soon: Gods & Dollspell!
#7re: NY Times about effect of economy on theatre...
Posted: 10/8/08 at 1:50pm
The online article in the link does not mention Guys & Dolls. If it was removed, that would imply that it was wrong and the writer did, in fact, mean Godspell.
Does anyone have a copy of the original article (scan, screen grab, whatever) with the G&D reference? I'm curious to see what it said.
Everything in life is only for now. ~ Avenue Q
There is no future, there is no past. I live this moment as my last. ~ Rent
Videos


