Posted: 1/1/10 at 2:19am
Papermill announces the most boring cast in the world for Lost in Yonkers
#1
#2
Posted: 1/1/10 at 2:20am
For a regional theater that employed ELAINE STRITCH last season, this is incredibly disappointing. *yawn*
#3
Posted: 1/1/10 at 2:46am
SOOOO, people bitch about 'stunt-casting' non-theater professionals, but then ALSO bitch when solid theater professionals get the jobs. In a regional production, no less!
#4
Posted: 1/1/10 at 2:51am
Read what I wrote, Q. I didn't say stunt-cast. I said cast some people with a bit of a pedigree. Considering the theatre professionals Papermill has employed in the recent past, this cast is second rate.
Updated On: 1/1/10 at 02:51 AM
#5
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:00am
It's still a regional theatre. And many of these actors have extremely respectable credits- it's not as if they cast some nobodies off a street. Just because you don't know their names doesn't mean they're any less talented than "stars".
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
#6
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:04am
"cast some people with a bit of a pedigree"
Please indicate where they haven't.
Please indicate where they haven't.
#7
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:06am
For the second time, I didn't say they should cast stars. However, we're talking about a theatre that in the past has employed the likes of Elaine Stritch, Chita Rivera, Christine Ebersole, Harriet Harris, Betty Buckley, Ann Miller, Karen Ziemba, Robert Cuccioli, Jane Kaczamarek, Kelly Bishop, Tony Robers, Carolee Carmello, Donna McKechnie, Matt Bogart, Judy Kaye, George Hearn, Dee Hoty, and so forth. None of them would ever be considered stunt-casting or big "stars." But, all of them are infinitely more interesting than these people.
And I am convinced they could have gotten solid NY actresses for the two female leads. Those are fabulous roles.
And I am convinced they could have gotten solid NY actresses for the two female leads. Those are fabulous roles.
Updated On: 1/1/10 at 03:06 AM
#8
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:09am
Papermill has recently experienced money problems so that may have been a reason for the no name cast.
In addition, Brighton had a great cast & it did not make any difference in the end.
In addition, Brighton had a great cast & it did not make any difference in the end.
Poster Emeritus
#9
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:17am
I think these ARE NYC actors - working actors who have a building resume (or established credits that go back many years) - and this is just another link in that chain.
I find the concept that because their names aren't recognizable it becomes 'boring' offensive. In the extreme, actually.
There are performers on this very site who don't have the credits these people do, and I would be THRILLED for them to have the chance at solid work such as this.
I find the concept that because their names aren't recognizable it becomes 'boring' offensive. In the extreme, actually.
There are performers on this very site who don't have the credits these people do, and I would be THRILLED for them to have the chance at solid work such as this.
#10
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:20am
Sometimes understudys or lesser known actors are better than stars tackling theater roles. An example is Julia Roberts who was less than great in 3 Days of Rain.
Poster Emeritus
#11
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:22am
I'm sorry, but an unknown regional actor like Sara Surrey in the Tony-winning role of Bella was NOT what I was expecting for a role like that.
I'm sure she'll be competent, but that is not what I was expecting from Papermill.
I'm sure she'll be competent, but that is not what I was expecting from Papermill.
#12
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:25am
Not to put too fine a point on it, but how exactly is anyone supposed to GET known in your particular view?
#13
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:27am
The Old Globe is doing the show this winter as well. They got Judy Kaye for Grandma. Is she a name? No. However, she's a heck of a lot more interesting than Rosemary Prinz.
#14
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:27am
I could care less who the actors are as long as they are good & the show is as well.
I saw the original years ago & if I lived in Jersey I would not hesitate to see it with this cast.
I saw the original years ago & if I lived in Jersey I would not hesitate to see it with this cast.
Poster Emeritus
#15
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:31am
"she's a heck of a lot more interesting than Rosemary Prinz"
Unless you're familiar with Ms. Prinz's work, I can only assume that the real difference is in name recognition. If that's the case, there really isn't any discussion to take place.
Sorry you'll miss out on seeing people you find 'interesting'. Hopefully, some other people will actually be entertained by the play.
Unless you're familiar with Ms. Prinz's work, I can only assume that the real difference is in name recognition. If that's the case, there really isn't any discussion to take place.
Sorry you'll miss out on seeing people you find 'interesting'. Hopefully, some other people will actually be entertained by the play.
#16
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:43am
adamgreer, you're a tool!
You, too, ljay!
That is all.
You, too, ljay!
That is all.
Salve, Regina, Mater misericordiae
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
#17
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:45am
K.
#18
Posted: 1/1/10 at 3:45am
Lmao <3
#19
Posted: 1/1/10 at 4:12am
Um, Alex Wyse is extremely talented and I've heard wonderful things of him in the role when they most recently did it in Florida. Same goes for Rosemary. You should really go see it before you label it as "boring".
Bill Finn rocks. Woot.
#20
Posted: 1/1/10 at 4:31am
God forbid someone who doesn't light up signs across Broadway gets the chance to play a fabulous role at the Papermill Playhouse.
"If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don't want to do it." -Stephen Colbert
#21
Posted: 1/1/10 at 8:46am
Rosemary Prinz was a very well known soap opera star in the 1960's and 70's, and was an extremely popular leading lady in the many "star" summer stock theatres of the era.
#22
Posted: 1/1/10 at 8:50am
This thread (the OP) would read offensive to any actor that happens to read it. They work endlessly auditioning for work. You mention 'credits to their name.' The credits of the actors are listed in the article.
#23
Posted: 1/1/10 at 10:08am
What a disgusting thread. I would kill (not literally) to work at Papermill, as would many actors, but by your logic, we shouldn't have the chance because we're not as interesting as someone else, as we're not slightly recognizable to theatregoers. Thank you so much.
And Q is absolutely right - how are people supposed to become "interesting" if they're not given the chance to shine in great roles?
And Q is absolutely right - how are people supposed to become "interesting" if they're not given the chance to shine in great roles?
Updated On: 1/1/10 at 10:08 AM
#24
Posted: 1/1/10 at 10:14am
Wow, I didn't realize that actors are automatically "boring" unless adamgreer has heard of them.
Thanks for enlightening me.
Thanks for enlightening me.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
#25
Posted: 1/1/10 at 10:26am
This thread is so horrible for so many reasons.
Formerly SirNotAppearing - Joined 3/08
BroadwayWorld TV
Ticket Central