"No, nonononono. The actors should NOT stop the show even if they are being distracted. There should have been at least one usher within earshot of the argument. This was a shortcoming of the house staff, there's no excuse for that to be going on longer than 60 seconds."
"60 seconds"? Are you serious? It's not about the actors being distracted, it's about the audience. If, as the OP says, a significant part of the audience is being distracted for more than 10 minutes, an actor should have stopped the show. I would prefer that 100 times over having my focus pulled by a bunch of jerks in the audience. Also, lay off house staff. See PThespian's post upthread.
"That responsibility belongs only to Stage Management, actors can and are reported to Equity if they take matters into their own hands"
So, which is it? House staff or stage management, trpguyy? I don't doubt that Equity has such a rule, but can you cite even ONE example in which an actor has been reported? If you can, what was their punishment? I can't imagine in this case that an actor would be penalized for stopping the show. I have been at many performances when an actor has stopped the show, briefly broken character, or responded in character to a disruption. It has, in my anecdotal experience, been universally met with audience approval (vocally and with applause).
eta:
"Maybe they did not stop the show due to the union overtime rules. Do not know if this covered in their contract"
Love ya, Roxy, but you do tend to union bash. Here's the deal with unions and stopping shows. They don't care if a show is stopped. That said, if the show is supposed to end at 10:50 and ends instead at 11:01, it has "broken the hour" and a significant amount of people will get paid for the extra hour.
Updated On: 5/16/16 at 10:33 AM