No matter how this plays out, it's a shame these two had to go to court to settle their differences. I'm curious to see how their agreement was written, and what the points of contention are. If he has a clear cut, contractual right to money, I can't see how a lawyer would let her go to court. There must be some murky clause or ambiguous wording in the agreement that he's contesting.
Nothing I've read says anything about him being treated unfairly during the creative process, so I don't see how his character or hers would be at issue. Seems like it's based on his rights to money from her performances, based on his contributions.
"It does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg."
-- Thomas Jefferson