First of all, when a show transfers from, say, London or Off-Broadway, I imagine that the financials of the Broadway production are considered separate from those of the original production. Especially if the original mounting was not created with the intention of moving it to Broadway. Is that correct?
If so, my main question is this: if a production like this is being directly transferred from a financially separate run, wouldn't that drastically lower the capitalization cost for the Broadway production? I.e, if the show is cast, the set is already built, the props and costumes have been gathered/made, the show has already been developed, rehearsed, and mostly teched through (though adjustments would obviously be needed), etc. etc.
And if all of that is the case, wouldn't that give the production in question a big leg up on recoupment?
I'm thinking in particular of Betrayal and Sea Wall/A Life. Both of which seemed to be very smooth, direct transfers. I'm also thinking of shows like Constitution and The Ferryman, both of which did announced recoupment after originating at non-profit theatres.
Updated On: 8/18/19 at 01:12 PM