The best performers do not stay the same every night, nor do they give a completely different performance every night. The best performers have married the two. They live within the framework of their direction, but carry themselves on a fresh journey within that framework, bringing their current voice to the work. These actors create a tension between the predictability of the production's set ways, and the thrill of
today. Douglas Hodge comes to mind... He gave a consistent performance in
La Cage but it was never exactly the same... he lived within his framework, because he allowed there to be a sharing between him in the audience... it was always specific to
that day.
Just my two cents on the matter. Because, to me, there is zero reason to hire people on a year contract to recite a performance. You might as well film it, because making something seem engaged and new and visceral is not truly live, so why would I waste my time and money to see something pretending to be truly live?! We live in a world that is funny, and super disengaged, so why waste theatre into being false? The actors that are bringing
today's voice to the work in a consistent way are the artists who truly lend themselves, and thrill us. Boring people who coast on a planned evening are forgotten quickly. And on the flip side, tactless, reckless actors who putz around with vision and specificity by being completely different every night are likely not providing a consistent voice to the piece they are playing in.
Polar extremes are often stupid. The middle...the tension between the two, is where I believe we are seeing the real work of opinionated, specific, and brave contemporary artists.
How to properly use its/it's:
Its is the possessive. It's is the contraction for it is...
Updated On: 9/12/11 at 03:22 PM