gypsy101 said: "qolbinau said: "Similarly, I thought that he also was exaggerating Manuel's box-office prowess. It was always Hamilton that was the star...I personally still wouldn't bank on any show that Manuel stars in being a hit. "
did you not notice all that hullabaloo that occurred when he was leaving the show? resale tickets sold for thousands of dollars. the guy is a star.
also I think you can bank on it; he's starred in two musicals on Broadway and look! both hits.
"
I don't deny he probably sold some tickets, but with both shows I think the causality of box office success is likely better explained by other factors. In the Heights he was basically completely unknown so it's very unlikely its success was due to his name. With Hamilton, his departure was likely timed with a general decrease in hype for the show. Had he left the day before the Tony Awards I'd guess those very high resale prices would still have persisted for a similar amount of time. Indeed, the whole increase in resale prices peaked around the Tony Awards I believe. They didn't peak for the entire duration of Miranda's involvement. I'm sure he was loved and had his fans, but it is and always has been the show marketed as the draw. There is little indication that audiences generally are really bothered whether Miranda is in the show or not. When someone is responsible for the box office success, the show tanks without their involvement.
Give me claws and a hunch, just away from this bunch.
Updated On: 8/20/16 at 06:14 PM