Meh. I stand by my original comments. The show is deemed "original, unique, brilliant, a masterpiece!" by many, but I say it's just mediocre performance art. I think it is getting the praise that it does because this type of performance art is new to the many who claim it to be "original, unique, brilliant, and a masterpiece." It's new/rare for Broadway, that's for sure. But if you attend performance art pieces more regularly, you'll see that this show is just mediocre.
Don't get me wrong, it's not bad, and I liked it, but my feelings are mixed.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle