...what could be next, if suddenly movie-goers get "into" Sondheim?
A Little Night Music, starring Emma Thompson (Desiree) and Gary Oldman (Frederik). With Cate Blanchett and Hugh Jackman as Charlotte and Carl-Magnum... and Judi Dench as Madame Armfeldt?
Sunday in the Park With George - with Ewan McGregor and Rene Zellweger?
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/14/05
Sunday in the Park With George - with Ewan McGregor and Rene Zellweger?
Is it bad that I would totally see that?
I could too...but I'd rather see Nicole Kidman (Ducking for cover here).
get the director of Pan's Labrynth to do "Into the Woods"!!!!!!!!
Just my Friday fantasy here.
But reading the Harry Knowles movie review (on another thread) today, he wasn't at all familiar with the stage show... and yet he seemed very into the lyrics and the songs.
Maybe other film-goers will wake up while watching this movie and say, "Hey, who wrote this sh*t? It's brilliant!"
...And our little Stevie Sondheim will be "discovered" by American movie audiences, at the tender age of 75.
Comden could have his cute little Hollywood-concept "Follies."
You mean Condon?
Betty Comden isn't making movies anymore.
How about Into the Woods, filled with stars and cameos:
The Witch - Catherine Zeta-Jones
Baker's Wife - Cate Blanchett
Baker - Paul Giamatti
Cinderella - Ann Hathaway
The Two Princes - Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenthaal (also as the wolf)!
Red Riding Hood's Grandmother - Angela Lansbury
Cinderella's Stepmother - Meryl Streep
The Narrator/Mysterious Man - Jack Nicholson
Jack - Zac Efron
Jack's Mother - Bette Midler
...just fill it up with stars!
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
If Follies is filmed and based on the Chapin book instead of the musical itself blood will be shed. Just sayin'.
Efron's too hot. You'd want someone attractive obviously, but attractive in more of the adorable/endearing sense.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/14/05
You had me until Zac Efron.
Edit: Ha, B3TA. You beat me to it.
Updated On: 11/2/07 at 10:44 AM
I don't see Follies working on film, period.
The only way it would stand a chance is if it were a backstage story. The life imitating art imitating life cycle of events would play well on screen.
Otherwise, forget it. It's a maudlin, self-absorbed, dated, esoteric period-piece.
Four people would go to see it, and I'm afraid I wouldn't even be one of them.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
I agree that it probably wouldn't be successful on film, but I don't agree that turning it into the backstage story would do it any favors. If it's a musical no one would see, who is going to go see the backstage story - particularly when there's really not enough filmable drama to go around?
Best left on stage then.
I would love to see a film of Merrily We Roll Along, too, but I don't think that would work either.
It could work BETTER on film than it does on stage, but I still don't see it "clicking."
...and I would skip past Pacific Overtures too. Unless they do one of those "starts on a stage and then turns into real life" things that NEVER works in a movie.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
Yeah, I could see Merrily "working" on film, I just don't know that there's much of an audience for it.
Can you imagine if the "Into the Woods" reading of 13 years ago had ever transformed into a film? Here was the cast, if you don't recall:
Baker: Robin Williams
Baker's Wife: Goldie Hawn
Witch: Cher
Wolf: Steve Martin
Giant: Danny DeVito
Jack: Elijah Wood
Jack's mother: Roseanne
Cinderella's stepmother: Bebe Neuwirth
Red Riding Hood: Mayim Bialik
Rapunzel: Samantha Mathis
Rapunzel's Prince: Brendan Fraser
Cinderella: Moira Kelly
Cinderella's prince: Kyle MacLachlan
Cinderella's father: Michael Jeter
And I guess Penny Marshall was going to direct, since the reading was at her house?
The problem with Into the Woods, is that everyone thinks it would be a hugely expensive movie to make.
It doesn't have to be Lord of the Rings, with crazy-elaborate special effects. It just has to be good.
Broadway Legend Joined: 11/23/05
My God.
I think Merrily could work if he was involved in re-structuring it so it didn't run backwards in time. But that would probably kill his whole concept wouldn't it. Never mind.
(But it is his most accessible score IMHO)
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
Yeah, running the story forward would kill any poignancy and make for a very difficult evening. Both Folies and Merrily are two of the hardest Sondheim shows to crack, so to speak. They have their devoted fans (and I love both), but even theatre folks don't usually find those shows very inviting. As Tazber pointed out, the Merrily score is pretty accessible, but the story around it (and the way it's told) wigs people out. It's a similar situation with Follies.
Bring in David Lynch and see what he can do.
Now I sound like Cruel_Sandwich!
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
For which? Follies or Merrily? He should do Assassins.
I was thinking Merrily, but Assassins is a much better choice. And it would give the Rush Limbaughs of the world a fit.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
I'm the only person who can bring Follies to the screen. And after I win the lottery, I will.
Call me if you need a production assistant.
and call me too! Hell I will bring the donuts every day! lol
Videos