September 1st Broadway walk out? — Page 3

I don't hate Republicans. I do think that the policies of this administration are bad for New York, America and the world. And I do hate that they think its o.k. to try codify discrimination, rendering me a second-class citizen.
www.shutitdownnyc.com

I am a LC Republican, and I just have to say that I'm appalled at what some people had said about Republicans.

But anyway, I get enough crap because I'm a Republican actress, so I don't know why I still get surprised when I see some cheap shots other people take. It just gets lower and lower.

The idea itself, all political things aside, I don't think will work economically. Broadway is already on shaky enough ground, I think that some actors might take the night off, but I'm not sure about all of them.

I'm not going to go into the politics stuff- because I don't agree with that, but anyone can protest, and we'll see what happens with this.

Personally, I think that it will hurt matters, more than help. Protests, yes, but I think that the hatred is what is going to hurt this movement.

We'll see.

It wasn't talked about in this thread, but rage and hatred sometimes is really what's behind this.

If any sort of protest is really carried out in an extremely negative way, it's not going to help the people who are protesting.

And I, for some reason, am not sure what you are implying in the first comment you're making, and I'm not sure I want to know.

As a person who spent no small amount of time protesting the Vietnam War, the administration, and any number of governmental policies....I've gained some perspective during the intervening years. My politics have NOT changed. I am just as appalled now, by the things I was protesting then, as I was at the time.

What I *have* learned, is how polarizing and ultimately self-defeating some protests can be. Unfortunately, many of the things that felt the most satisfying at the time only drove a bigger wedge between "us" and "them". Back then, I thought the goal was to convince "them" to see things "our" way, because IMO, the truth was on our side. Only now that I'm older, do I realize how unlikely it was that "in-your-face f**k you" tactics would inspire a shift in the opposite side's belief system. Guerrilla tactics and demonstrations by large numbers of angry protesters put pressure on policy that helped lead to the end of our participation in Vietnam, to be sure....but when it comes to effecting change in social issues, f**k you tactics have never been the path to winning the "hearts and minds" of the other camp.

As much as I still love a good, impassioned protest, I think a sick-out the night the Republicans plan to catch a show, would mosst likely reinforce unfortunate existing beliefs. It might make the acting community feel better to display their anger, but it'll do nothing to further gay rights. I say that much more is to be gained by introducing any and all theater attendees to the joys of live performance. Which just might lead some to start thinking about the actors, whose performances they have just enjoyed, as real people who have real lives and real loves....some of whom might be partners of the same sex.

And while we're at it, the same holds true for those of us who do not, shall we say, embrace the Republican agenda. We need to listen to what the other side is saying, because although we are likely to take issue...no one is ever ALL bad or ALL good; totally wrong or totally right. If we don't at least listen to what they have to say, no matter how ridiculous it might ultimately prove to be, we have forfeited the right to expect anyone to listen to us.

---

I guess I don't really view this as a "F&^* you" approach. I think what RNCNotWelcome has planned for the 29th is much more in your face.

As I said before, I think the casts do have a great opportunity during their performances that week to make a statement during their curtain calls. Would love to see it happen
Ask Broadway to Help Send The GOP a Message

"And as for the Republicans on this board, I ask you how can you possibly support an administration that wishes to change the constitution in order to prohibit gay men and women from having their relationships recognized? "

It is actually the hardest thing for me, since I do support gay marriage.

But I said to myself, right now, the war and our country's condition...it's more important to me than the issue of gay marriage at the moment. John Kerry isn't exactly the most supportive of it either (if I'm correct, I may be wrong). I don't want John Kerry taking the country into his hands at this moment, especially. Maybe in four years, once this is all settled, I might consider changing my vote, but that's really depending on who the candidate will be.

And as a Log Cabin Republican, I'm still a Republican, and I don't want to see my country in the hands of such a liberal president because of that one belief.

It was really hard for me to get to that conclusion, and believe me, people are really upset that I decided that. But I did.

That's sad, Guenevere. I don't mean that sarcastically or judgementally. It's honestly sad that you have to compromise your own humanity that way.

---

Guenevere - I can appreciate your position, as I can't say I believe in the one-issue vote either. However, my position is that the current administration is responsible for the negative aspects of our existence that you site - the 'war' and our country's condition. So, for the reasons that you want to keep them in place, I want to remove them. After Mr. Clinton's back-stabbing the gay community, I think someone would have a hard time arguing that the Democrats are what we need to give us our rights. But, they could posibly lead us in a different direction concerning your issues than down the drain, as we seem to be headed now.

Guenevere, I see a ridiculous amount of Republican-bashing on these boards. People hold the beliefs they hold for all kinds of reasons and it's not up to me to judge them for it. But I do find it embarrassing as a gay Democrat to see the hatred being spewed against ALL Republicans without qualifications by others who hold the same beliefs as I.

---

So why do we have to stoop to his level? How does that show how wrong he is?

---

There are some of us who do not bash all Republicans (I would never bash my father, my brothers, my sister or many of my friends...that's something I could never do).

However, I will fight to my last breath, for a woman's right to choose and for equal rights for all citizens. The Republican platform is what is troubling to me. And it's a relatively new phenomonon (thank you, President Reagan, wherever you may be).

I don't have a problem with Republicans. I just have no idea how one supports that kind of platform.

---

That's great, robbie, because that is what America is. My family is also made up of Republicans, and I don't understand it, but they have their reasons and I leave them to them.

America is all about fighting to your last breath for what you believe in, while at the same time allowing your neighbor who disagrees with you to do the same.

---

Oh I agree with you, DGrant. I just find it more of a mass groundswell among my Democrat peers.

---