GreasedLightning said: "MarkBearSF said: "gleek4114 said: "If I recall correctly, Lestat made more money in San Francisco than any other tryout in that area up to that date (including Wicked). I'm not sure if that is still true today, but we all know how Wicked did on Broadway in comparison to Lestat..."
It DID get a big pre-sale, largely based upon the WIcked experience. However, the stench of a horrible flop was quickly evident at the Curran. It was anything but a hit in SF.
"So people bought tickets to a completely different production before it even started performances solely based on the last tenant of the venues success story? Which had no correlation or connection whatsoever to this new, incoming production? Seems silly to me. You'd think San Fransicoans would know better. "
*San Franciscans
I really don't remember this being the case, but I don't remember it not being the case either. I think people were very excited about another new show coming that could be just as good/as big a hit as Wicked. Not to mention the solid cast, and intriguing-at-least creative team.
I was at what I think was Jack Noseworthy's final performance. Lestat was an experience, that's for sure.
"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt