Camelot - I'm doing a production now and people are very polite and generous when they see it, but everyone can't understand why the company decided to put THIS show on. That's another matter but the show itself is quite awful, even though some hail it as a "classic". Stail script, so-so songs, awful and forced segues into songs, and just a bad show altogether.
Herbie: "Honey, Don't you know there's a depression?"
Rose: "Of Course I know, I Watch Fox News"
-(modified)Gypsy
Broadway Schedule
December 5th- Hamilton, On Your Feet
December 19th- Noises Off, Edith Piaf Concert at Town Hall
This is stupid. So no one should EVER revive these shows? There have been quite a few succesful productions of shows that people have thought shouldn't be revived. Declaring a show should not be revived is pretty closed minded. With new concepts, different casts, fresh direction... a show you thought was stale might turn out to be quite wonderful. That's what is fab about live theater.
Dec 3, 1960 - Jan 5, 1963 Musical / Original Majestic Theatre, NY, USA #2 Jul 8, 1980 - Aug 23, 1980 Musical / Revival New York State Theatre, NY, USA #3 Nov 15, 1981 - Jan 2, 1982 Musical / Revival Winter Garden Theatre, NY, USA #4 Jun 21, 1993 - Aug 7, 1993 Musical / Revival George Gershwin Theatre, NY, USA
Other than the original production, I can't say the show has done very well with audiences. The show is hopelessly dated, and not just because it opened in 1960, yadayadayada.
I don't know why you're on the CAMELOT warpath, but it's a charming, moving show with a fantastic score.
Yes, perhaps it's a little too long and perhaps it needs some tightening, but it's generally well-written. Perhaps you're just having a bad experience with it.
And did you ever think that the failed productions below were just horrible productions?
"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy."-Charlie Manson
"Smart! And into all those exotic mystiques -- The Kama Sutra and Chinese techniques. I hear she knows more than seventy-five. Call me tomorrow if you're still alive!"
I just got a really funny image of a bunch of monochromatic cats running around playing instruments on stage. Jellicles can and jellicles do.....
DOYLE IF YOU ARE READING THIS, STEP AWAY FROM THIS SHOW
"We don't value the lily less for not being made of flint and built to last. Life's bounty is in it's flow, later is too late. Where is the song when it's been sung, the dance when it's been danced? It's only we humans who want to own the future too."
- Tom Stoppard, Shipwreck
so seriously... i brought it up in a post a while back... but what's wrong with a show being dated... don't almost all shows eventually become dated? is that a bad thing?? does everything need to be contemporized (besides orchestrations because I love new orchestrations and stuff)...
I mean, I really hated Cats (for example) but I wouldn't say it should never be revived because a revival of it could possibly make me love it. I think there are a lot of shows that shouldn't be revived for a couple years yet (because there was a recent production of it or the climate feels wrong or for whatever reason), but I would NEVER say a show should never be revived. I mean, that's the real cool thing about theatre. You can, uh... revive it.
"You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view - until you climb into his skin and walk around in it."
To Kill A Mockingbird