News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
pixeltracker

Spring Awakening: Differences between Show and Musical- Page 2

Spring Awakening: Differences between Show and Musical

Yankeefan007
#25re: Spring Awakening: Differences between PLAY and Musical
Posted: 9/19/08 at 10:23pm

Bump...

Finally stumbled upon the Hughes trans. and it's the mother-load. It almost streamlines the whole thing. Definitely better than Franzen's and Bentley's.

HeyMrMusic Profile Photo
HeyMrMusic
#26re: Spring Awakening: Differences between PLAY and Musical
Posted: 9/21/08 at 2:13am

And it's actually easy to understand. Finally a comprehensible translation. It's really a shame that it's no longer in print.

~Steven

geekgirl06 Profile Photo
geekgirl06
#27re: Spring Awakening: Differences between PLAY and Musical
Posted: 9/21/08 at 2:45am

Well... this could just be direction... but to me a big difference is that in the play, what happens between Melchior and Wendla is clearly rape, but in the musical, it's much more intimate and not as black and white, and if you ask me, it's mutual (Wendla clearly tells him to go on). And the musical point of view definitely hits closer to home in showing the perils of the ill informed, because no matter what parents tell their children, children are still going to do what feels right, whether or not they understand the consequences.


Dancing through life... For the next ten minutes

antonijan Profile Photo
antonijan
#28re: Spring Awakening: Differences between PLAY and Musical
Posted: 9/27/08 at 4:40am

I hope our local theaters can do the play...

The musical kept me wanting more.

dramamama611 Profile Photo
dramamama611
#29re: Spring Awakening: Differences between PLAY and Musical
Posted: 9/27/08 at 8:49am

The ending is definitely one big change...the other is the sex scene. The play it is rape, in the musical it is not. Knowledgable of sex or not....Wendla does consent.

For some people they will argue whether the current production is rape or not....but the cast as well as the director and Sater have directly said it is not.

I read the play version before I saw the musical. I was moved by both in different ways.




If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.

frontrowcentre2 Profile Photo
frontrowcentre2
#30re: Spring Awakening: Differences between PLAY and Musical
Posted: 9/27/08 at 1:57pm

I had seen two very fine productions of the play before the musical version was announced. I am not convinced that the music adds anything significant to the drama, but the musical is a valiant (and mostly successful) adaptation.

The play, however, was riveting. Much is made of the sex scene in the musical. In the play there were several including one solo and one group masturbation scene. (In the latter the boys were on stage wearing white briefs with tiny flashlights inside. They moved the lights to simulate the act and as each one finished they turned off the light. It was brilliant but the audience was dead silent in that sequence...almost like no one was breathing!)

My most vivid memory was of the final scene where the actor playing Moritz was flown in on a "cloud" appearing headless with his head under his arm. (The actor playing Moritz put his own head through the arm of either a dummy or a second actor costumed to look headless.) It was a startling image to say the least.


Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!

I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com


Videos