#2
Posted: 9/29/16 at 7:52am
Was that the shortest preview period ever!
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian
#3
Posted: 9/29/16 at 9:47am
It was a very short preview period by today's standards, but keep in mind that this one-man show had already been running in the UK. Not to say that the previews were unnecessary -- it's 15-20 minutes shorter than it was 10 days ago.
#4
Posted: 9/29/16 at 10:18am
"Was that the shortest preview period ever!"
In the good old days, there were shows that had one preview (Come Blow Your Horn, Milk and Honey), or two (Irma La Douce, Under the Yum-Yum Tree), etc. Other shows opened without any previews at all.
#5
Posted: 9/29/16 at 10:58am
I'm very curious to see how the reviews will be. I predict very mixed-- from raves to pans, as that has been the experience just among my friends and colleagues. We shall see.
#6
Posted: 9/29/16 at 11:11am
"I'm very curious to see how the reviews will be. I predict very mixed-- from raves to pans"
More likely raves than pans. This one has snob hit written all over it.
#8
Posted: 9/29/16 at 8:39pm
Strange that neither Playbill nor BroadwayWorld have a Review Roundup going...
Updated On: 9/29/16 at 08:39 PM
#9
Posted: 9/29/16 at 8:56pm
There is one up on BWW.
Just give the world Love. - S. Wonder
#10
Posted: 9/29/16 at 8:56pm
GreasedLightning said: "Strange that neither Playbill nor BroadwayWorld have a Review Roundup going...
"
BWW has one going.
#11
Posted: 9/29/16 at 9:01pm
Usually they are up much earlier, considering the performance time begins much earlier for openings.
And for the record, BWW's wasn't published until after my post. But thanks.
#12
Posted: 9/29/16 at 10:00pm
Brantely's review. Critic's Pick.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/30/theater/the-encounter-review.html
CZJ at opening night party for A Little Night Music, Dec 13, 2009.
Updated On: 9/29/16 at 10:00 PM
#14
Posted: 9/29/16 at 11:21pm
After Eight said: "^
Surprise, surprise.
Well of course it was no surprise as he raved about it after he saw it in London. Your snark was also no surprise. Same old same old, heavy emphasis on old
"
CZJ at opening night party for A Little Night Music, Dec 13, 2009.
#15
Posted: 9/29/16 at 11:38pm
^
RoM,
Glad I didn't disappoint you.
What about the other completely predictable raves? Surprised by them?
#16
Posted: 9/30/16 at 5:48am
^ "completely predictable raves" because this show is fantastic, I hope you mean. I saw it (heard it?) in the West End and there's nothing like it in mainstream theatre, at all. It's ingenious and challenging and special and it should get raves if reviewers enjoy it as much as the majority of audiences here did. What he's doing up there is amazing.
#17
Posted: 9/30/16 at 7:16am
"completely predictable raves" because this show is fantastic, I hope you mean"
You hope wrong. I suggest you read the comments on the show by the posters here in the previews thread. They found it anything but fantastic.
Which made it all too predictable that the critics would rave about their latest darling to come down the pike. They sure are enamored of their British bores! I guess that's why they keep getting imported here. But, really, it's so unnecessary. We have enough bores of the home-made variety right here. Perhaps not as overpowering as this one, but bad enough, just the same!
#18
Posted: 9/30/16 at 1:18pm
Very possibly the worst Broadway show I have ever seen. It a live audio book, nothing more.
#19
Posted: 9/30/16 at 4:41pm
This is not a live audio book... stop calling it that. A live audio book does not have visuals. No projections, no choreography. It would be someone in a chair reading a book. This is not that.
#20
Posted: 9/30/16 at 4:55pm
If all you got from it was it was an audiobook, then it def. wasn't for you. Not going to say you missed the point because that's condescending.
#21
Posted: 9/30/16 at 6:00pm
RippedMan said: "Not going to say you missed the point because that's condescending."
"Not going to say [it]" is still saying it nonetheless.
#22
Posted: 10/7/16 at 10:45am
I saw this last night, and I guess I am in the minority since I thought it was spell-binding. I enjoyed the initial introduction to the technology and found the sound effects effective and neither phony nor intrusive, but I didn't want to see a demonstration of loop and binaural heads and lighting effects. I only really watched what was on stage when the story turned to the bedtime conversations with his daughter, which were a tremendous relief from the intensity of the main story: a photographer lost in the Amazonian jungle in the company of a primitive tribe. When the story became Logan McIntryre's, I closed my eyes and let the story telling take over. I thought McBurney was brilliant at that. Sometimes what was being presented on stage was not as startling as what I was seeing with just his words. But it is NOT an audiobook because so much of the story is not what happened but how Logan experienced it. This was interactive theater for me because I couldn't just sit there and let it flow over me, and I think some of my fellow audience members just wanted to be spoon-fed pablum. I would not have missed this for anything.
#23
Posted: 10/7/16 at 10:48am
"I think some of my fellow audience members just wanted to be spoon-fed pablum."
I think they just wanted to be fed something worthwhile, with or without a spoon.
This didn't qualify.
#24
Posted: 10/7/16 at 11:28am
I suppose that an examination of the nature of time, the empathy of human communities and the effect of physical possessions isn't really worth examining, in your opinion. And the characters of Barnacle and Red Cheeks and Cambio weren't real enough for you. It isn't really a question of the material being worthwhile as much as the personal taste of audience members to think about what they are hearing.
#25
Posted: 10/7/16 at 11:34am
^
The quality of the writing, the presentation, the acting, etc. all play a great part in making an evening worthwhile --- or not.
Tickets From $70
Tickets From $77
Tickets From $106
Tickets From $89