This year's "Egregiously Overlooked"?

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

This year's "Egregiously Overlooked"?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 1:51pm

So what are the chances of a "Julie Andrews" happening this year where one performer is the ONLY nomination a show receives?
And would that performer have the class/tenacity to pull a Julie by refusing a nod?

What if Lansbury is the only nom for Deuce?
Cerveris for LoveMusik?
Block for Pirate Queen?
Bundy for Legally Blonde?

Discuss...

PEACE.

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:00pm

If LB only gets one nomination, it'll be for Orfeh.

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:03pm

When I read 'Egregiously Overlooked' I immediately thought of THE CLEAN HOUSE...but that wasn't on Broadway LIKE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN. (...to be fair, from what I have read and heard. The script is brilliance.)

"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 2:56pm

I think Block has a real shot, but if Pirate Queen was completely shut out in the technical noms, it would indeed be "EO."

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:09pm

Nah, if anything, Curtains will be EOed. Or at least shut-out of most wins.

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:15pm

Wouldn't it be ironic if it happens to "Mary Poppins"? And by ironic, I mean not in the least bit ironic, but just slightly coincidental because of the Julie Andrews connection?

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:18pm

THE CLEAN HOUSE was wonderful, but absolutely does not belong on Broadway.

I wouldn't say that any of Sueleen's examples are likely.

LOVEMUSIK has a lock in Donna Murphy and probably for most of the design categories. The orchestrations and the book are also a strong possibility...so I don't think LOVEMUSIK is a realistic choice.

DEUCE may only get one nomination for Lansbury, but it wouldn't be egregiously. VICTOR/VICTORIA was something that should have been nominated in a bunch of categories - Supporting Actress, set, lighting, orchestrations, book, etc. It was blatantly and purposely snubbed. It's a rare case. DEUCE is just plain awful...so it wouldn't be egregious.

BLONDE has a great chance in a few of the categories - namely choreography, set design, costume design, and musical. If it did manage to only squeak out one nomination, it probably wouldn't be for Bundy but for choreography - and in that case it also wouldn't be so egregious.

THE PIRATE QUEEN is a strong contendor in the costume and choreography categories. Again - the show doesn't merit any other nominations, so a snub wouldn't be egregious.

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:29pm

Lansbury, the best thing about Deuce, will probably be the only nomination for the show and perhaps the only single nomination this year, though I can see A Chorus Line just getting nominated for revival and nothing else.

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 3:43pm

Yes, but this thread isn't about things that are only getting their one deserved nomination.

It's about shows that are blatantly snubbed in favor or something less stellar.

A CHORUS LINE is only eligible in 3 categories, and we all know that the cast is the worst thing about this revival. It wouldn't be egregious, it would be expcted.

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#10

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 4:20pm

I'm thinking that Debra Monk would be a perfect contender for the Julie Andrews Egregiously Overlooked award because that's what being Egregiously Overlooked is all about.

#11

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 5:54pm

I didn't mean for this to be a discussion of who is or isn't worthy of an nomination, but of the character of the lead actors who may be nominated at the exclusion of anyone else involved in the production.
Julie Andrews was very close to V/V, of course, and the fact that not one other person was nominated was, she felt, a slap in the face to her close collaborators who gave their blood sweat and tears to that show from day one.
So, take Block, for example. She has been involved with PQ since the very beginning, as have most of the technical team and the cast. If she were the only one to get a nom, do you think she would consider refusing the nomination to stand in solidarity with her company?

PEACE.

#12

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 9:59pm

Block's own money isn't in the show. Andrews had all kinds of motivation for doing what she did that no one else eligible to be nominated this year does.

Have I ever shown you my Shattered Dreams box? It's in my Disappointment Closet. - Marge Simpson

#13

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 10:51pm

Not quite as dramatic, but Ebersole has money in GREY GARDENS.

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#14

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 10:54pm

Not to the same extent, and her husband isn't the producer/director.

Have I ever shown you my Shattered Dreams box? It's in my Disappointment Closet. - Marge Simpson

#15

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 10:58pm

So, take Block, for example. She has been involved with PQ since the very beginning, as have most of the technical team and the cast. If she were the only one to get a nom, do you think she would consider refusing the nomination to stand in solidarity with her company?

Hell no! I think her company would slap her silly if she refused the nomination. Are you even kidding me? The costumes, the make up, the dancing, the songs, the direction... they all have a huge part in shaping her Grania. It's up to her to take what they give her and deliver but if she gets nominated it's like a little bit of all of them got nominated too (sort of... ok, sappy post over).

Updated On: 4/30/07 at 10:58 PM

#16

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:01pm

Wow, Popular, I had NO idea you'd chime in on that one.

Do you get a message sent to your cell phone every time "Stephanie Block" or "Pirate Queen" is mentioned?

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#17

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:03pm

The fact is, Andrews didn't have to worry about her career stalling or ending because of her statement. Who else can say that this year, besides Lansbury?

Have I ever shown you my Shattered Dreams box? It's in my Disappointment Closet. - Marge Simpson

#18

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:21pm

Right.

The Andrews situation is something so specific and so rare that nothing can be compared to it.

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#19

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:39pm

so, what exactly is the story about Victor / Victoria? Why did it not get any nominations?

#20

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:42pm

I'm not the right person to answer this, but I believe that many people dislike Blake Edwards and therefore snubbed his production.

I'm sure Rath, Margo, Bennett, etc. know more about this.

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#21

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:45pm

I just looked at the tony awards website...man, it was snubbed. I really like this show, and State Fair! Swingin on a Star for best musical...really?

#22

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:49pm

Exactly.

A lot of people thought V/V was horrible. I loved it - and it certainly deserved nominations of Musical, Supporting Actress, Orchestrations, Score, Lighting, Choreography, Scenic Design, etc.

"If you are going to do something, do it well. And leave something witchy." -Charlie Manson

#23

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 4/30/07 at 11:53pm

Here's a thread I searched out of people discussing the situation
Thread talking about it a bit

#24

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 5/1/07 at 12:39pm

I thought Julie's cold shoulder was a stand of solidarity with her "family" and not about money, but you are probably right. As you all know, I always look for the good in people and thought Julie was above such pettiness...(can someone splash some water on Rath's face?)
Does anyone know how the V/V company reacted to Julie's refusal of the nomination? Were they honored? Pissed? Or too drunk to care?

PEACE.

#25

re: This year's 'Egregiously Overlooked'?

Posted: 5/1/07 at 7:48pm

"As you all know, I always look for the good in people"

LOL!

Have I ever shown you my Shattered Dreams box? It's in my Disappointment Closet. - Marge Simpson

← Back to Message Board

View all Videos

Tickets From $59

Tickets From $70

Tickets From $106

Buy Tickets