This article was in the Raleigh News&Observer. I thought it was interesting, because it kind of said the opposite of what I had heard on this site...
In the actual paper, the title was "The star is sick. You're on."
Edit:Sorry the link didn't show up. Here it is :
http://www.newsobserver.com/lifestyles/story/2014755p-8398746c.html
that's was interesting...thanks!
i wanna be sutton's understudy..
Great article!
I want to be an understudy in Little Women...
I saw her! She was EXCELLENT! I was happy I didn't see Sutton first, because I would have discounted Julie's talent. I'm going back the 30th to see it again and I hope Sutton will be in. However, if you find that Sutton is out on the night you're there, don't fret because Julie is great!!!
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/31/69
which part was the opposite of what youd heard here? that her understudy wasnt good? or that most leads have an understudy and a standby?
what a fun article... it would be tuff to be an understudy. ::waves wand:: Mucho respecto.
Interesting article...but why does ATC always gets more recognition than bww...:-P
Mistress- I had heard that Julie Foldesi was horrible from several people on this site. I also heard that people think the show won't last without Sutton, but the Little Women people seems to think otherwise. Obviously, they are going to say that, but still..
chinkie azn jai- I was thinking that exact same thing!
Videos