So... since I started this thread, I've become very curious about the issues at hand and started researching this. As I wrote earlier, it seems that France's program of banning mobile technologies in the theater and employing jamming technology to enforce this ban has been extremely successful. Israel and Japan also permit jamming technologies, ALL with no reported loss in safety. Canada and Great Britain are now considering similar changes in their current policy.
Actually, the main opponent to this technology is the Cellular Telephone Industry Association (CTIA). As suggested, they cite safety as their main reason despite all of the data to the contrary. Dig deeper and it seems like so many things its political and has more to do with money than safety.
ALL reports in countries that are employing these technologies have reported absolutely no increase in harm to it theater going patrons. There are technologies that do allow for emergency communication in such situations and they are employed - they are just restricted to the appropriate personnel.
In addition, the 1934 law that is being used to ban such technology in The United States was clearly written before these issues emerged and there are many proponents to changing the law.
As also suggested, the CTIA believes the solution is through education. This has been their policy for over 10 years. Clearly, that's working.
ARTc3 formerly ARTc. Actually been a poster since 2004. My name isn't Art. Drop the "3" and say the signature and you'll understand.
Updated On: 1/15/14 at 05:29 PM