This is always a useful and fair discussion, about covers for any show. I've talked to a number of people who saw the Cott and Osnes 1st covers for "Bandstand" and felt much was lacking, including meeting the vocal demands in one case. When Osnes was out for a contractual concert in Chicago, they put on her 2nd cover for 2 of the 3 missed (both of hers are apparently leaving). Back in the day, I saw covers for two of the three women in "Aint' Misbehavin'" and felt something was decidedly missing, good as the replacements were in general terms. When people shame us for voicing our disappointment (invariably here or elsewhere if someone dares mentions an understudy's liabilities.) it's odd. We are consumers who pay a lot for these plays, and we are certainly entitled to our responses. This vibe that we are required by some unwritten law to "appreciate" understudies and standbys is well-meaning. And we do appreciate the challenges of their jobs. But we are also savvy, and when someone goes on we didn't enjoy, we are justified in expressing it.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 8/2/17 at 08:51 AM