"The truth is Val's husband Tony Cacciotti initiated this lawsuit (not me) very much like he did when he got his wife fired 20 years ago from her television series and then subsequently sued NBC. " So he's using the age-old defense of "but they started it"? A suit does not require a counter-suit, especially not one seeking excessive punitive monies. Bringing up Harper's old lawsuit doesn't help his case, as far as I'm concerned. Is he trying to paint her (or her husband) as lawsuit happy because she's had two in 25 years (as far as I know - I suppose there may be more). That lawsuit was found to have merit, and she won it, for the most part. So what's his point?
"I have to disagree with you; having also seen that play on Broadway, I'll state that I thought the entire thing was a mess of a turd, featuring writing so artificially banal it made the worst sitcom look like Arthur Miller's work.
Harper was great fun to watch, but there were no redeeming aspects to the simply awful writing, leaving a less-skilled actor (Brian Hutchison) to struggle and drown." Ok, you caught me. I was being nice. It is a true testament to Harper's skills that she elevated that material. That's some heavy lifting, boy. I like to imagine Michael Mulharen sitting up in the booth thinking of his paycheck.
Did you happen to see HIGH? I hesitate to ask what you thought of that, newintown.
Valerie's Family lawsuit
Updated On: 4/28/14 at 11:38 AM