dramamama, I think you're being unfair to OperaBdwyLover, sometimes - often - the tears need to be in the audience, not the actor. And often an actor has to walk a fine line between the way he or she personally feels - including tearful - as someone hearing or reading a piece from the way the character is feeling. There are scenes that should get tears from the audience (including the actor if he were in it, but he isn't, he's on stage) but not from the performer, and there are scenes which should get tears from the audience precisely because they are not getting tears from the performer.
The response one experiences reading, seeing and understanding a scene is not necessarily - and is often completely different, and dependent on the very difference - from the emotional condition - inside and out - of the character who is in the scene.
One might well cry watching Shirley Booth or Anna Magnani when they are not shedding a single tear.
I don't know the scene OperaBroadwayLover is talkingabout, but of course OperaBroadwayLover had to think about what she was saying while performing the scene, but to think about it as the character did (using the actor as the medium to find the character), not necessarily as the actor did if he or she were in the audience. And there are many times in life one has to act because of painful experiences while connecting with what the painful experience is forcing us to do in the present rather than what the painful experience meant to us at the time.
And there is no reason to believe OperaBroadwayLover either held back on emotion or wasn't astounding.
Updated On: 3/2/13 at 08:33 AM