I have a chance to see it in Seattle this summer, but I'm not sure if I'll be going. I know there's not much info about the show out at the moment but should I just go see Shrek because its new, even with the possibilty of an audience filled with little kids that wont stop laughing at all the old jokes; or should I just pass on it completely?
I would definitely go see it. For me, I just want to see it for the music by Jeanine Tesori, which Michael Riedel says shows off her musical intelligence.
That's kinda how theater works, you know? When there are new things, you just don't know. In fact, not even the source material is any indication of the quality the production can achieve - I say you wait until you hear a bit about it to decide - you could leave the theater in ecstay and amazement or justy plain wishing to never see a show again.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
Go! For better or for worse, you'll be part of theatre history. And I think with the writers attatched, it could be a fairly good show. I don't normally go ga-ga over these big spectacle type shows, but this one seems interesting.
"It means nothing to come and sit in a theater night after night and immerse yourself in fantasy, only then to walk out the door and be unchanged in reality. This show will live on in our hearts. But where it truly must survive is in our actions, our compassion and our generousity of spirit towards one another." - Adam Pascal on the closing of RENT
We're in New Haven in 1956. A man is debating whether or not to go the opening night of a new musical called My Fair Lady based of Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion. "I think it will bastardize GBS", he says. What should he do?
"I mean, sitting side by side with another man watching Patti LuPone play Rose in GYPSY on Broadway is essentially the equivalent of having hardcore sex." -Wanna Be A Foster.
"Say 'Goody.' Say 'Bubbi.'" ... "That's it. Exactly as if it were 'Goody.' Now I know you're gonna sing 'Goody' this time, but nevertheless..."
Is it wrong that the thing I am most looking forward to about this show is how much fun David Letterman will have with it being right next door to him?
I live in Seattle so im definantly going. partly because as someone said -you will be a part of Theatre history -Also it will probably have an amazing cast and it has some amazing writers so, y not go see it?? i mean tryouts are usually cheeper then seeing it on broadway
i saw Young Frankenstein from opening night-closing in seattle and spent less for all that then i did spending money for a week of tickets in New York. I'd do it!!
Sutton Foster, Kecia Lewis-Evans and Chris Sieber.
Go. Rejoice.
"Oh look at the time, three more intelligent plays just closed and THE ADDAMS FAMILY made another million dollars" -Jackie Hoffman, Broadway.com Audience Awards
I would say to definitely go. In my opinion, it would be very interesting and memorable to see a show in it's beginning stages before it makes it's big move to Broadway.
uhmmm, if you want the movie, then ,NO don't go...if you want a new piece of theater then by all means, go...If you judge by original source material, than Pygmalion enthusiasts may have never seen MY fair Lady...No, I am not comparing Shrek to Pygmalion or My Fair Lady,but this day and age is far removed from yesteryear...Theater is theater...some of it is crap, but the luxury still remains...YOU get to decide 4 yourself...
I am a firm believer in serendipity- all the random pieces coming together in one wonderful moment, when suddenly you see what their purpose was all along.