If it is the 2 nd balcony, it is definitely nosebleed city
Recent word is that the balcony would offer an extremely obstructed view, due to the set. Not sure if that is an official reason or not.
cause the show sucked in SF.
couldn't resist the pun
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
so the Palace has two sets of balconies? or is just orchestra?
The Palace has orchestra, mezzanine and balcony seating. But they apparently decided not to sell the balcony seats for LESTAT because of bad sight lines so for now it's just orchestra and mezzanine.
Strange. Have any of you been to both the Palace and the Curran? (I have no idea what the difference is in size or dimensions.)
I've seen Lestat from the back of the balcony at the Curran, and the view really isn't that bad -- the only thing you miss is Marius' big Elphaba moment at the end of Act 1.
Then maybe the set designer should go to his drawing board and do his job.... making the show viewable from most every seat in the house! Sorry i am a designer and that is what i was always taught.
designer or not, how can anyone take you seriously with your spelling and that avatar?
Updated On: 1/31/06 at 02:03 AM
it's 2 in the morning and i know i have terrible spelling... if there was word check on here i would use it... As for the avatar i alwas get commented on my cute avatars!
How is anyone suppose to take you seriously when you don't even post about the topic?
edit: i also ran my first comment through spell checker and the only thing that came up was that i didn't capitlize my "I"s
Updated On: 1/31/06 at 02:11 AM
That doesn't make it not a problem!
P.S. Is "Sapphire" supposed to be misspelled in your sig?
Stop critisizing their spelling, its the god damn internet, not an english class, and if you have to stoop that low to make fun of someone, by critisizing their spelling? pretty childish if you ask me.
Updated On: 1/31/06 at 02:58 AM
The obstructed view is and always has been the reason for this. It was an publicized decision from the moment they announced the Palace for this show. The set that reaches out from the sides and above the stage is a major part of the design and the balcony seats at the Palace are very steep, much more so then the Curran. They decided they didn't want to sell any seats with severely restricted viewing. Some people have applauded that decision, not to take all the money that they can get at the expense of the audience (insert your easy audience size joke here), but not on here I'm sure.
Stop critisizing their spelling, its the god damn internet, not an english class, and if you have to stoop that low to make fun of someone, by critisizing their spelling? pretty childish if you ask me.
You spelled "criticize" wrong.
P.S. Many areas of life are not an English class, but it still matters.
P.P.S. Have a great spelly day!
I know booking a theatre isn't an easy thing, etc, etc, but does anyone else just find it flat-out weird that they're using a house that doesn't even work for the show (assuming that the sight lines are in fact too obstructed to use the balcony)?
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/21/05
Designers seem to only design shows for the center of the house. That said, if an ENTIRE section is completely obstructed, perhaps the designer needs to re-think the design. With the not-so-great word of mouth from this show, I would think they'd want to sell every seat available. It could possibly make or break the show. But also, it could also be a marketing strategy. Block out an entire section, then when the house is "sold-out", they magically have seats to sell.
So is it that the red crinkly stuff around the stage is going to impede the view? Because really, I'm not seeing how that is such an important part of the set. Maybe they're speaking of some other set element, but I'm not sure what it could be.
My wonder (aside from the Spelling Bee on the thread) is how people who don't know the Balcony isn't on sale is going to affect their opinion of the show. I always like to get a look at the house, but if one looked up and saw a completely empty level, someone not in the know might think "Wow, this show isn't doing well at all!"
Conversely, does that affect a show acoustically? Or the effect on the actors, who will always see a third of the house empty from day one? It's interesting.
PS The view from Rear Mezz blows big time. I couldn't count the number of times during Aida where I had to crouch down in my seats just to see action upstage. Why not just cut out the last 3-4 rows and put those seats in the Front Balcony?
As for the actors, they would know why. Seeing it for that reason and seeing it because tickets blatantly aren't selling are two different things, I think.
I dont think they should have to comprimise the set due to the theatre they booked. If that was the only one they could get, than certain adjustments must be made. I saw most of Aida's performances from the Balcony and found them always to really not be bad. I had full view of the stage and always could see what was generally going on. I found it to be a pretty "bigger picture". My favorite seats in the Palace however are First Row Frnt Mezz. The absolute best view of that stage IMO.
"You spelled "criticize" wrong."
and..?
And you obviously don't understand irony.
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/15/05
Hm...now I really wanna see the set to see what they mean. Didn't they not sell the upper balcony for All Shook Up?
Chorus Member Joined: 7/14/05
I think the obstruction is pretty pointless. The side seats at the Curran were that way too because of the "crinkly stuff" that bordered the stage. Pointless, but it impedes vision.
SECOND-yes, spelling is important, but people who constantly correct other peoples grammer and spelling are ANNOYING...and also pointless. Message boards/IMs are about sharing thoughts and feelings quickly. A person shouldn't spend 10 minutes proofreading and writing drafts of a 2 paragraph post.
Videos