Nick Jonas & Michael Urie in HOW TO SUCCEED... Thoughts? — Page 7
Posted: 1/9/12 at 2:41am
Posted: 1/9/12 at 2:59am
Posted: 1/10/12 at 6:04pm
I will say, I was slightly disappointed after the opening night show. I'm a Starkid fan (not as avid as most of their fans, but I still enjoy their shows) so I was looking forward to seeing Darren in a more professional show and thought he would do great. It definitely was not what I pictured. His dancing was terrific, his acting okay, and his singing okay but nothing spectacular.
Then, I went again on 1/8 mainly cause it was a free ticket and I was very surprised that I actually thought Darren improved A LOT within that week. His voice sounded a lot stronger and his acting was more easy to follow for the character (he still has the innocent take on Finch but you took it more as Finch being an extremely good actor when scheming his way up in the company). It just worked a lot better.
Something I've always found about Darren is that he is not the most consistent performer, at least vocally. So, I can understand why people that were not previously fans walking in would not fully enjoy his performance. It can also be a hit or miss when going into the theatre to see his performance. I enjoy his voice but it definitely has flaws, which is what I think a lot of people enjoy about him surprisingly. I think he could do well in other roles, but he needs to be very careful about which ones he does take on. I think Finch managed to work overall for him but there are not many traditional roles I could picture him in. I think his highlights were "Rosemary" and "Grand Old Ivy." "Brotherhood of Man" was great dancing wise but was vocally shaky. He does put all of his effort and energy into his performance though.
Beau was just a disaster both times. His acting was rushed to me and his singing voice was just horrendous.
Be warned though, the audience can be insane and rude if you're going. I was fine with the cheering but people were leaving in the middle of the 2nd Act to go outside and wait at the stage door. THAT, I was NOT okay with.
Anyway, overall I'm glad I went twice. The 2nd time was way more enjoyable and the audience was more tolerable. Darren definitely has talent, he's definitely someone that people either love or hate though. I'm glad I got to see Dan and Darren, cause I will not be going back to see Nick as Finch.
Posted: 1/10/12 at 6:28pm
Yeah, THAT is just extremely not cool, and I'm very disappointed with any fans who would do that. If people are going more so that they can meet Darren than to see the actual show, they shouldn't be going. I mean I'd love to meet Darren too- he seems like a total sweetie and generally cool guy- but you do not get up in the middle of the show to do it. That's rude on so many levels.
Anyway, glad to hear he feel like Darren improved! I'm planning on rushing on probably Thursday (possible Fri), so I'm glad it's seeming like he's really settled into the role now :)
Posted: 1/11/12 at 2:25pm
Updated On: 1/11/12 at 02:25 PM
Posted: 1/11/12 at 4:00pm
Posted: 1/11/12 at 4:23pm
Fingerlakessinger, and how many of those Broadway vets have a sucessful music career outside of Broadway?
Updated On: 1/11/12 at 04:23 PM
Posted: 1/11/12 at 4:40pm
Posted: 1/11/12 at 4:48pm
Yes, yes, they're all jealous of Darren Criss because he has had success as part of a show that puts out CDs of bland, Autotuned crap.
Posted: 1/11/12 at 5:20pm
Posted: 1/11/12 at 8:22pm
I am admittedly a Glee/ Darren fan but a broadway one first. How to Succeed is one of my favorite shows all around. I did the show in High School, playing Bud Frump, and saw this current revival in previews with Daniel Radcliffe. I personally love this revival. It's everything a broadway musical comedy should be, bright, colorful, polished, and fun.
Darren Criss delivers a performance that is very different than his predecessor Daniel Radcliffe. Mr. Criss' Finch reminded me of Jimmy Stewart in a sense. He played finch as a bright eyed, eager, old fashioned gentleman way, which I enjoyed and appreciated. I would say that Mr. Criss is more of a song and dance man than Daniel Radlcliffe, however that is to be expected given his background with GLEE, and his other previous experiences. His dancing was superb, he is very quick on his feet and moves well.
My one and only small criticism, would be his voice is a little weak, but by absolutely no means whatsoever as horrendous as people on this thread make it seem to be. To be honest, going into the show, I was a little curious to see how Darren Criss would handle this role vocally. It is a very classic American broadway Musical Theatre score, and Darren Criss is a pop singer; no questions about it. That's his style and that's what he feels comfortable doing. However, given the fact that he only had two weeks of actual rehearsal to prepare for the role, and that he ADMITTEDLY has had no formal vocal training, he did a great job. He does have a very good voice. I think if he was in this show for a longer run, and he did not have another project like Glee going on, which is incredibly demanding, he would have been more secure vocally and it would have just given his voice that little push to make it THAT much stronger. He could have really devoted the time to work on it, but given the circumstances, he was fine.
In all sincerity, when he finishes with Glee, he could have a career on broadway if he wanted too. He has everything going for him. If he found a good project that was built around him, or one at least he was involved in from the very beginning, he could definitely do it. The theatre was packed so he obviously will sell a show and bring people in. Not only that but he can deliver. I think this was a great project for Darren to get his feet wet and get a taste of Broadway. Broadway also got a feel for him. I encourage everyone, Glee fan, or not, to catch Darren in his run of the show before he leaves.
Updated On: 1/11/12 at 08:22 PM
Posted: 1/11/12 at 8:29pm
Posted: 1/11/12 at 8:58pm
Understanding Broadway: The Replacement
Posted: 1/11/12 at 9:02pm
He delivered an outstanding performance all around. All I'm saying is if, he had THAT much more time to make his voice THAT much stronger, it would have helped him. Like I said, he does not have an HORENDOUS voice, by any means, to me, it just sounded like he needed to put a little more support behind his sound.
Posted: 1/11/12 at 9:15pm
Posted: 1/11/12 at 9:24pm
But like I said his sound just needed more support, which is not a bad thing, it's just something he needs to learn over time.
Updated On: 1/11/12 at 09:24 PM
Posted: 1/11/12 at 9:36pm
Not to be a bitch, but you do realize that doing a 360 would bring him back to where he began, right?
Posted: 1/11/12 at 9:46pm
Posted: 1/11/12 at 10:04pm
His highs are still the same: charm, charisma, a winning presence, some good dance moves and a pleasant voice. However, his shortcomings, though a little diminished, have not essentially changed: his stylized and somewhat light pop voice doesn't entirely mesh with the brassy Frank Loesser score.
Posted: 1/11/12 at 10:04pm
Posted: 1/12/12 at 6:39pm
Read more: https://forum.broadwayworld.com/readmessage.php?page=7&thread=1040567&boardid=1#ixzz1jI3RAdUc
So you are saying you attacked this kid all this time and you hadn't even seen the show. When did the Broadway boards become Tumblr?
Posted: 1/12/12 at 6:45pm
Updated On: 1/12/12 at 06:45 PM
Posted: 1/12/12 at 6:52pm
Posted: 1/12/12 at 6:55pm
BroadwayWorld TV