gypsy101 said: "in what way is it parodying musicals
"
Repeating the name of the leading character 40 times in the opening song. Topped off with an affected look into the audience by saying the name one last time, before the mandatory headflip on the final chord.
All the lame acapella chorus parts in for example "what'd I miss" (very musical parody-ish) and many other fill up material that does not make sense musically.
A leading character strutting around the stage, shouting "just you wait, just you wait" all the time.
Self important lyrics, like, "the word got around, this kid is insane man".
The constant recurring row of people facing the aucience with affected faces, preferably turning on a chord.
The forced placement of "now we need a self important song" combined with "now we need a jolly song".
oh yes i forgot that this is the show that invented looking into the audience at the end of a musical number.
in the opening number, his name is literally said 8 times (twice as an echo). It's the title of the song and his name is the name of the show. So I don't really know what your problem is with that. 8 times isn't going to kill you. also the character doesn't strut around the stage saying "just you wait," he says it (3 times) while walking along the docks on his way to New York City.
There's also no use of acapella in the song "What'd I Miss" so I'm pretty sure you hallucinated that part.
"Contentment, it seems, simply happens. It appears accompanied by no bravos and no tears."
Well, listen to "What'd I miss" from 0:55. You have not listened to it? Or were you hallucinating while doing it?
And yes, there are more musicals with a head flip on the last chord, facing the audience in an affected manner, but that is why I say musical parody. Hamilton copied it, not invent.
I'm just glad that good shows do not do this.
Also the "just you wait" is not just in the opening song (again, have you listened to the show?)
Well, you may feel that way, but the rest of America would not agree with you. Especially the 11 Tony Awards the show received. It isn't mocking musical theatre, it is a brilliant piece of theatre. The lyrics in this show are exemplary. There is a reason why there is so much hype.
gypsy101 said: "oh yes i forgot that this is the show that invented looking into the audience at the end of a musical number.
in the opening number, his name is literally said 8 times (twice as an echo). It's the title of the song and his name is the name of the show. So I don't really know what your problem is with that. 8 times isn't going to kill you. also the character doesn't strut around the stage saying "just you wait," he says it (3 times) while walking along the docks on his way to New York City.
There's also no use of acapella in the song "What'd I Miss" so I'm pretty sure you hallucinated that part.
"
You must have also completely forgotten that Dave19 is racist, hence his intense disdain for this musical. You're wasting time and energy on him. Move on.
Liza's Headband is right. Dave19 is racist. He's a troll and he's baiting all of you with his rhetoric. You're all better off just ignoring him or blocking him altogether.
Another thread overcome by trollery. Gypsy get out while you can!!
In seriousness, I really hope they do the film unconventionally. I think if they did it like a conventional costume drama it would be really hokey. And people might call into question the multi-ethnic casting in an otherwise period accurate non-fiction based film.
Someone on here suggested a music video style version shot in modern NYC/DC etc and I think that could be cool. Even if they still wore period costume (how crazyy would that be?). It also might excuse the addressing the audience aspects. BUT it could have even a bigger risk of feeling hokey by being too "concept."
Mr. Nowack said: "Another thread overcome by trollery. Gypsy get out while you can!!
In seriousness, I really hope they do the film unconventionally. I think if they did it like a conventional costume drama it would be really hokey. And people might call into question the multi-ethnic casting in an otherwise period accurate non-fiction based film.
Someone on here suggested a music video style version shot in modern NYC/DC etc and I think that could be cool. Even if they still wore period costume (how crazyy would that be?). It also might excuse the addressing the audience aspects. BUT it could have even a bigger risk of feeling hokey by being too "concept."
"
Great point.
It should per definition not be realistic/literal because the way of storytelling and the material and the artform is not.
This goes for a show/film like Miss Saigon too. To avoid it from being silly they should make it a triumph of the fantasy.
I've said that I think the film should use period costume / decor but in the setting of modern-day NYC. I think that would be cool. seeing everyone in horse-drawn carriages but with the backdrop of the skyscrapers could be cool.
"Contentment, it seems, simply happens. It appears accompanied by no bravos and no tears."