CNN.com to broadcast Obama speech at 10:15AM — Page 8

shhhh, don't tell them, ywiw. they think that the general election is exactly the same as the primary. they also think that the iraq war was the only issue that mattered in '06. i'm not worried though. they're so far divorced from reality that it won't sink in until they watch that map turn bright red on nov. 4th. then the real fun will begin. not that watching democrat bloodsport for 5 more months won't be fun, but wow will it really get ugly then!

---

"anyone who thinks we're going to invade iran before the end of dubya's term is so out of touch that they have no need of that sense and should donate it to someone who might actually use it."

"MUSCAT, Oman (AP) — Retaining his tough stance against Iran, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney said Wednesday that Tehran mayhave restarted the nuclear weaponization program that a U.S. intelligence report said was halted in 2003." Um that is from today. This is certainly an agenda of some kind, we on the left have done a lot to expose the truth about this situation.

"me just ignores what he doesnt want to hear. "

She will not win the delegates. Michigan and Florida are not valid and if Barack starts campaigning there only Hillary stands to lose. Similar states have proven as much.

"After winning Penn, she will have won THE 3 major swing states and most of the major states. She also wins in rural areas. Any superdelegate is going to have to consider these very important facts."

The problem with this is that Hillary will not have won the popular vote, she will not have the most delegates. I'm not sure who you are listening to but she cannot win this. The same voters that are voting for Hillary in these swing states will just go to Barack and unlike Hillary, Barack can get conservatives and undecided.

I'm not sure why you want the fight here, or are on the defensive. I'm all for a fair fight in this election, but Hillary's slams that McCain is better suited is not Democratic. That math does not JRB.

"And I'm tired of fighting about this race. Whoever gets it I will celebrate."

Celebrate now it's a boy!

" I already responded to this allegation you raised, and you dismissed it. It was a private library, and I would prefer that the Royal Family in SA had not contributed and made the gift. But, I don't think it is a fatal flaw."

Funny thing though it's not on the news, I would rather the American public decide what is and isn't fatal. The problem with this and her ties to the Carlyle group is that this money is dirty with terrorism. Why she wont put out her tax returns is beyond me if none of this is fatal.

I'll be back in a few months to tout Hillary's demise. I'm gonna go look for Huckabee. Papas right on the mark though about some of this, if Hillary doesn't get out in a month or two I don't know if a democrat can even win in the general election. Watch out y'all I hear Cheney is now saying Al Quaidas are being armed by Iran. Uh-oh...

you sound Italian with those "ama"s papa.

---

bafungu, taz!

oh, see, there it is. the justification for bammy's loss: hillary didn't get out in time.

that way the zealots can continue to ignore reality and clamor for more losing candidates. thank god for the far left. i really was worried back in january. what a difference a few months make.

---

oh now there's my old pal, mejusthatejewsgaysandmyselfmostofall. drudge? i don't think i've ever linked to drudge. no, the people who get hot and bothered around here by him are all cheering the black or the bitch. but thanks for playing. we'll see you when you get back and the democrats are deciding on weapons for their duels.

---

Updated On: 3/19/08 at 04:52 PM

if it ain't broke.

---

clearly those numbers mean nothing, art. once the nation has had time to digest the greatest speech ever given by anyone ever in history, they will clearly rally to bammy like gangbusters and he'll be leading by 130% or 175% easy. at that point, i mean, why even vote? just like name him god and be done with it.

---

Congrats, orangeskittles. That's exactly what I mean about the left adopting the nasty Hillary-Hating tone of Ann Coulter.

---

"That's exactly what I mean about the left adopting the nasty Hillary-Hating tone of Ann Coulter."

i don't understand what the problem is if what is said is TRUTH... there is a huge difference between dialogue on Clinton's "bitchiness" and dialogue weighing statements of fact... how are these discussions of fact somehow irrelevant and overly malicious when we are choosing the possible next president of the united states?

Updated On: 3/19/08 at 06:06 PM

"The problem I have is that Obama sat there for 23 years and had no problem with it, yet now claims that the words were offensive."

YWIW, I agree that this would be something to question. And I keep hearing this. But is this just an assumption? I don't remember him addressing this specifically in his speech. But prior to this speech Obama has said that he has had no problem in telling the pastor when he did not agree with what he was saying. So I'm not sure that we really know that he sat there silently all those years.

---

From RawStory, a left-wing political news blog:


GOP ad makers salivate at potential in Wright comments

---

Arts,

On a similar vein, Obama claims to have only discovered the tone and tenor of Wright's speeches as he was about to launch his Presidential bid. I find this a bit hard to swallow. From Obama:

"The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church."

Who did he make clear to that he condemns the comments? How, when these speeches are available for sale by the Church, was he surprised by the tone and tenor? This just does not ring true to me.

Look, my problem is not with the Reverend, but with how Obama is trying to play both sides of the issue.

It is absolutely Clintonian.