There are no universal rules. The "commitment" needs to be mutually agreed-upon by the people involved. That's all.
If he's having sexual encounters outside of this relationship, and his wife is not cool with it, he has violated their commitment. It's not up to him alone to make the decision. But if it's mutually agreed-upon, he hasn't violated the commitment.
More often than not, though, I see an "open relationship" that's really only "open" with one of the partners. That, i find wrong.
Approaching it from the other side, I've been in a situation (a couple of times actually) where I've been approached by someone in a relationship who wanted to involve me (presumably for a fling). I couldn't and wouldn't do it. At the time, I was single (so it was a while ago), but I knew I wanted a sexually and emotionally monogamous relationship myself someday. There was no way I could involve myself (knowingly) in any relationship that wasn't. Plus, it was clear to me that the other partner, in both cases, wasn't aware of what was going on. At best, he was "turning a blind eye." Again, I find that wrong.
I think "responsibility" and "respect" are key words missing from many so-called committed relationships today. A lot of "grownups" who are acting anything but grown-up.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 10/24/11 at 08:39 AM