I dont mean to argue with you, i'm just saying that when this was first proposed Bloomberg and his Transportation chief said it would help the poor. In all sincerity - is this what they actually said? My understanding is that it was proposed as a
transportation alternative in some of the busiest,
most congested parts of the city. Which is exactly where it's been placed - with plans for further expansion.
There are cost benefits, as well - but I never heard it expressly stated as a program for the 'poor' or minority populations.
The map of where the bike stations are is pretty clear. They serve the areas of the city that are the most congested. If they
happen to be "rich", "white", or whatever else
you say they are: so be it. That's where the traffic is. And that was the point.
ETA:
From the Citi Bike website:
Citi Bike is New York City's bike sharing system.
Intended to provide New Yorkers and visitors with an additional transportation option for getting around the city, bike sharing is fun, efficient and convenient. A bike sharing system consists of a fleet of specially designed, sturdy, very durable bikes that are locked into a network of docking stations sited at regular intervals around a city. The bikes can be rented from and then returned to any station in the system, creating an efficient network with many possible points and combinations of departure and arrival.
About Citi Bike
"Two drifters off to see the world. There's such a lot of world to see. . ."
Updated On: 11/11/13 at 05:57 PM