Matt Damon
Marion Cotillard
Kate Winslet
Laurence Fishburne
Jude Law
And Soderbergh directing.
I am so there on opening day.
Oh yea, Gwyneth is in it too. But it looks like she dies early on* so I can deal with that
*not really a spoiler, it's in the trailer.
Trailer
Broadway Legend Joined: 6/28/07
*VERY BIG SPOILERS*
I saw it last night and, while intriguing, I felt that it left a lot of issues unresolved. On top of that, it seemed like only Matt Damon (as the husband of Gwyneth Paltrow's patient zero, who turns out to be the only known person immune to the disease) and Jennifer Ehle (as the workaholic doctor who develops the vaccine) were given three-dimensional characters to play.
CONAGION was a more plot-driven film than it was character-driven. The ensemble of "star names" listed above and the other characters who we follow become a minor supporting role to the leading character, the leading character being Humanity.
This film really missed the mark for me. It was entertaining, but it left too many unanswered questions, too many plot holes, and not enough resolution.
You should write PR copy. Your "the leading character being Humanity" is the kind of BS jargon that ad-folk love to use when a film so spectacularly misses the mark that it doesn't develop any of its characters.
I too was left cold by it. Would've loved to spend more time with Cotillard's character, whose growth seemed to occur in the forty minutes the film forgot about her.
For a global catastrophe, things seemed remarkably low-stakes for most of the characters.
The shadow of an environmentalist message at the end was overshadowed by a very compelling argument for proper food handling.
Cotillard's character was the most frustratingly underdeveloped and unresolved. I won't say any more here for spoiler purposes, but the final scene she was in was ridiculous.
Fortunately, Cotillard is a compelling enough actress to keep her role interesting.
The film was fortunate is fill its cast with such wonderful actors. It was extremely reliant on their abilities to make it.
I just saw it and I thought it was interesting and intriguing, but it seemed to abandon the "global epidemic" fairly early and became too focused on the US response/resolution, which was such a cliched perspective.
Broadway Star Joined: 5/14/03
Broadway Star Joined: 7/20/07
Saw it on Saturday night and was severely disappointed. This is truly a movie that will strive on its star cast alone. If it wasn't jam-packed with Oscar winners, this would just be a less action-filled and more pretentious "The Day After Tomorrow".
While the first third of the movie shows a lot of promise and actually builds a fair amount of tension, the direction the rest of the plot decides to take is pretty boring and not very entertaining at all. Lots of scientific speak that really doesn't make a ton of sense (ya know, considering this is a FAKE disease so why should an audience care so much about FAKE scientific formulas?) does not a potboiler make. And the two most interesting storylines (Marion Cotillard's and Kate Winslet's) are cut FAR too short. And the dialogue was cheesy to the max. Really, really bad dialogue.
Overall, fairly entertaining. Would I recommend it? Nah. And definitely don't waste extra money on IMAX (spoken by a true fan of the IMAX experience). This movie is a major disappointment.
Videos