Here's some more interesting statistics on gun control. You're more likely to be struck by lightening than be killed in a shooting.
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/12/26022-9-must-see-gun-control-statistics/2/ And of course I do, it's terrible what happened but saying how sorry I am about it isn't going to change anything. I want to prevent something like this from ever happening again, and clearly having more gun control didn't work in CT, so why would it work if no one had access to guns except criminals, who, if they can't get them legally, will just smuggle them in from Mexico or buy them from someone who has them illegally? Or do something even worse and use explosives instead, which can kill a lot more people in a much shorter time, and there's no way whatsoever to stop the killer.
And that's actually not true fingerlakes. Have you done any research whatsoever? Do you even know how to do good research and not just go by pictures you see on Facebook? Russia has extremely strict gun laws and they have a much higher murder rate than the US. Just because there aren't as many guns doesn't mean the murder rate is going to go down. People will find a way to kill people, no matter what the method is.
And continuing with the name calling just proves your immaturity. I've stopped with the name calling because I'm not going to lower myself to your level.