au contraire, mon frer. i already pay for my use of the subway and to the extent that the mta's budget is subsidized by the state and city, i should have a voice in how my money is being spent. however, someone who could not, as a minor, legally pay for a service, need have no voice in whether said service should or should not be offered since either way they would not be able to legally utilize said service.
i admit, "involved" is the wrong word. please see below revision:
why, pray tell, give a vote to someone who would not, in fact by definition could not, legally partake in the service being debated?
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.
...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty
pray to st. jude
i'm a sonic reducer
he was the gimmicky sort
fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective