FoxNews does it again, White House complicit again — Page 4

Wait I thought your issue was racism at the NAACP? It's their liberalism actually that bothers you? I guess I'm confused. I still don't understand why you hold OBAMA responsible but let BREITBART off the hook- you once admired Obama enough to vote for him. What has BReitbart ever done worthwhile?

I really hate to even interject here, but I'm just gonna point out that no liberal says the NAALCP. None.

There's no such thing as the NAALCP.

So, let's review the Breitbart gang's allegations:

When … she expresses a discriminatory attitude towards white people, the audience responds with applause. False.
The NAACP … is cheering on a person describing a white person as the other. False.
The NAACP audience seemed to have approved of her actions when she talked about not helping the white farmer. False.
They weren't cheering redemption; they were cheering discrimination. False.
As Ms. Sherrod recounted the first part of her parable, how she declined to do everything she could for the farmer because of his race, the audience responded in approval. False.

First Breitbart and his acolytes falsely accused Sherrod of discriminating against whites as a federal employee, despite having no evidence for this charge in the original video excerpt. Strike one.

Then they misrepresented Sherrod's story as an embrace of racism, when in fact she was repudiating racism. They later pleaded ignorance of this fact because they didn't have the full video. Strike two.

Now, with the full video in hand and posted on their Web site, they're lying about the reaction of the NAACP audience.

Updated On: 7/23/10 at 05:52 PM

As my grandma would say "But what's that got to do with the price of potatoes?" I'm trying to have a spirited political discussion with you and frankly you are increasingly proving yourself unworthy of my attention. We're talking about the Racism of the NAACP- When I ask you a question that hasn't been prepped by a fox news analyst you literally have no response. None. All you can do is grab a random talking point and toss it towards me like Van Helsing with a bottle of holy water. Now suddenly it's Van Jones (Dismissed by the white house).

Incidentally I was completely bewildered why suddenly you claimed that it was the REACTION OF THE CROWD in the doctored Sherrod tape that was the point- Where did THAT come from I wondered? Why, right from the mouth of Andrew Breitbart! No wonder you can not answer a question or engage in an actual debate, you take the words of others and use them as your own.

Politics is a serious thing- worthy of serious discussions by serious people. Sadly we're one short here. I can defend every position every statement I make- because they are my own. As I've proven by engaging you, you can not because they are not your words or your arguments. Sad sad strange little man.

The White house fired poor sweet Shirley before any video (or mention of the story) ever played on Fox News.

Facts are stubborn things.