Your honesty and transparency is refreshing. I am sincere.
The intellectual dishonesty we see so frequently, such as accusing people of thinking George Floyd being high was justification for killing him, is crap. There isn't anyone who disagrees the four police officers who heinously murdered and/or were complicit in the murder are deserving of murder/accessory charges and very long prison sentences. The issues are deep and complex, yet no one seems to want to dive deeper and attempt to find common ground on any of the issues.
From the perspective of an opposing opinion that racism and disproportionate use of deadly force by police are not nearly as pervasive as being asserted repeatedly - if the opposing opinion were to be correct in actuality, then real change of the type being demanded now would be impossible. In other words, you can't fix what isn't broken. Please don't bother attacking the simpleton clarification. I get it, but I think being very clear is important. This is a perspective that needs to be recognized, whether one agrees with it or not. With a lack of any real data presented by those asserting massive wrongdoing and the unwillingness to discuss, who can be surprised that those who disagree would not change their minds based on simple and frequent assertions or even massive protests? On the other hand, if the repeated assertions were to be accurate and true in actuality, why would anyone expect real change with the discourse as it is? Figuring out what is and is not true seems like the place to start, to me.
Patience, honesty, transparency, lengthy discussion, learning and mutual respect would be a far better answer than "we don't know what else to do", in my opinion. Unfortunately, my suggestion would require a seemingly impossible debate of millions of people capable of demonstrating such basic qualities to result in any real change. And this definitely won't occur, unlikely or not, unless a few people start and provide a decent example. I think it is a good suggestion, regardless.