Nah, I'm just a real conservative. We're hard to find, especially on musical theatre message boards, yet we do exist.
I wasn't of voting age in 2000, but I hated both candidates, so I dunno for whom I would have voted. I am against embryonic stem cell research and think that it's criminal how people are politicizing it by placing all of these hopes on it that may never come to fruition. Well, I confused Republican with conservative up there (sorry, I'm sick, so I'm not in the best frame of mind); it's hard to find a real conservative. Republican's just the party name, heh. As for the 2008 election, I have no idea... I guess Mitt Romney, even if he is a Mormon.

Namely, I identify more with the Republicans because I'm pro-war and I'm completely, 100% against socialist programs, don't want to raise minimum wage and think that unions are unnecessary and corrupt, am anti-gun control, pro-life (as established,) etc.
mominator: You can disagree with the Catholic Church on some issues and still be considered a Catholic. Abortion's the one social issue from which you can't defer. And while I tried to be against gay marriage at first due to my religion, I could not find a good non-religious reason for it to be illegal. As I've said, I value facts, rather than rhetoric.
Edit: pab: As I said above, we can't interfere in the Sudan because the UN won't declare it a genocide. Blame them, not the USA. When we actually do obey the UN, people still complain... just can't win, I guess.
Jimmy, what are you doing here in the middle of the night? It's almost 9 PM!
Updated On: 7/18/07 at 07:21 PM