yankeefan7 said: "So when the Cavs win it is because Lebron is a one man show and gets all the credit but when they lose in the finals, it is a team game - lol. I think everyone will agree Tatum is a budding star but he is still a rookie. Kevin Love statistically is better than Al Hoford in points per game and rebounds. Jaylen Brown averaged 14.5 points a game and 1.6 assists, I think that is pretty much what you would think is ok as a shooting guard. You do remember when Lebron went to the finals with Miami,he only had future HOF player Dwayne Wade and All Star Chris Bosh on his team - lol
Steve Kerr was a role player not a star carrying the team, so nobody would ever compare the players. He would have been nothing without people double teaming MJ so he could have wide open jump shots all the time. Just watch any sports talk show on ESPN, Fox Sports and they bring up the fact that MJ never lost in the finals and Lebron has already lost 5 times when they are saying who is better."
I don't have a lot of interest in these endless back and forths about something as subjective as this so I'll just make a few points and then you can say and think what you want.
It's silly to compare these two when MJ's career has been over for 15 years and LeBron has at least another 3-5 productive years left. That's why I said "when he's done". Having said that, LeBron has led his team to the finals in 9 of his 15 seasons, 8 in a row which is ridiculous. MJ did it in 6 of 15 seasons although admittedly the last 2 were with a bad Wizards team after a 3 year layoff. If you just watched the Dubs beat the Rockets, the team with the best record in the NBA, you saw just how hard it is to even get to the finals. James Harden, the presumptive NBA MVP couldn't get his team there. Just getting there is an accomplishment not to be minimized (and yes, Paul was injured but Iguodala a key player in establishing the Dubs passing game and flow was out too for 4 straight games and Klay Thompson, one of their big weapons was in foul trouble and on the bench for most of the first half tonight.). To go on about how MJ never lost in the finals just means in the other years he couldn't get his team out of the conference semis to get to the finals in the first place, nothing to brag about. The deeper you get into the playoffs, the better the competition you're facing and the harder it is for one single player to lead his team to victory no matter how good they are. It doesn't make James a lesser player. You can't win the finals if you're not in the finals.
During the 6 seasons the Bulls won the championship, they were almost always the best team in the league throughout the year. They won their division every year and in just 1 or 2 years did any other teams even have a comparable record to them. They never had to contend with a team as good as the Warriors with 4 All-Star starters. Never. They certainly were never a 4th seed in their conference like the Cavs were this year having to fight past a No. 1 and 2 seed to make the NBA finals. And being down 3-2 and needing to win the last 2 games and having Love play 5 minutes and contribute nothing those last 2 games, makes what James did even more impressive.
With the exception of the 4 years in Miami, and maybe 1-2 years in Cleveland, James has never been surrounded by the talent that Jordan had. James led a thoroughly mediocre Cavs team to the finals in his 4th year as a 23 year old. it took Jordan 7 seasons, not until he was 28 to get his team there. If none of that convinces you, look at this. James' last year with the Cavs before he went to Miami, the Cavs were 61-21. The following year, with largely the same cast of players but no James, they were 19-63. a 42 win drop cause James left. In MJ's last season in his prime before he went off to baseball, the Bulls were 57-25, the next year without Jordan, they were 55-27 and made it to the Eastern semifinals. Just a 2 win drop. Without MJ, the Bulls were still a solid playoff team. Without LeBron, the Cavs were a mess. What does that tell you about the impact they single-handedly had on their respective teams.
Jordan was 6'6" 195-200, James is 6'8" 250. When he wants to go to the hoop, James literally can't be stopped. We've never seen anyone like that before at that size with the strength to go against 7 footers and the agility to play guard. Magic had the size and the agility but not that kind of strength. And for the record, I think the MJ is better cause he never lost in the finals argument is silly. You talk about ESPN and FoxSports. They're paid to say polarizing, controversial things to get debates going and people clicking and tuning in. I don't make my judgments based on what long time provocateurs like Stephen A, Smith and Skip Bayless shout at me from the TV and neither should you.
It feels weird knocking MJ cause he's one of the all-time greats. And again, that's why I suggested when LeBron is done playing, we should measure full career against full career. But if you don't recognize and appreciate what LeBron has done to get his team to the finals this year, I'm sorry but you just don't know the game.
Updated On: 5/29/18 at 01:22 AM