#51
Posted: 1/26/05 at 11:29am
I personally thought that Washington and Berry deserved the Oscars in 2001. Washington deserved it over Crowe, whose performance in "A Beautiful Mind" just never convinced me.
Had Kidman been nominated for "The Others", as opposed to "Moulin Rouge", that would be a different story. Not that I don't love Baz Luhrmann's film, I do. It's one of my favorite films. However, Kidman's performance in Amenabar's ghost story was, I believe, the best performance of 2001. I'm still not sure why Naomi Watts and Steve Buscemi weren't nominated that year...
As for Foxx in "Collateral", he was brilliant. Both him and Cruise dropped their usual personas and formed one of the most dynamic screen duos of the year. Unfortunately, his role is the lead. Once again, that shows a great amount of disrespect and negligence for the actors who were clear supporting actors, like Munkustrap said. And why nominate him for two, when he's clearly going to win one of them?
Also, why nominated Eastwood (who received no precursos recognition for acting), over Giamatti, Bardem, and many other actors who were NOT also up for Best Director? So many questions this year... The AMPAS has officially lost my respect.
Munkustrap - I agree about the film version of "...World". While the performances were superlative, the film literally cut about half of the book.
Had Kidman been nominated for "The Others", as opposed to "Moulin Rouge", that would be a different story. Not that I don't love Baz Luhrmann's film, I do. It's one of my favorite films. However, Kidman's performance in Amenabar's ghost story was, I believe, the best performance of 2001. I'm still not sure why Naomi Watts and Steve Buscemi weren't nominated that year...
As for Foxx in "Collateral", he was brilliant. Both him and Cruise dropped their usual personas and formed one of the most dynamic screen duos of the year. Unfortunately, his role is the lead. Once again, that shows a great amount of disrespect and negligence for the actors who were clear supporting actors, like Munkustrap said. And why nominate him for two, when he's clearly going to win one of them?
Also, why nominated Eastwood (who received no precursos recognition for acting), over Giamatti, Bardem, and many other actors who were NOT also up for Best Director? So many questions this year... The AMPAS has officially lost my respect.
Munkustrap - I agree about the film version of "...World". While the performances were superlative, the film literally cut about half of the book.