Please delete Madonna from the original post, it's an insult to anybody who has ever been the greatest anything ever in any capacity. Not that her up-to-the-minute Crouching Tiger segment a year after the movie on her Drowned World tour wasn't groundbreaking or anything.
The problem with the construct in this thread is that it's a whole big bushel of apples and oranges and some grapes, nectarines and Madonna ("he hurt my feelings and made me feel bad about myself! boo hoo hoo!") being compared. And the fact is, looking at an act like The Stones, whose stadium tours now are well-oiled machines where they were slapdash and haphazard in the '70s, makes cross-career comparison difficult too. You can pretty much see and hear them wherever you sit now, thanks to technical advances. Also, Mick learned to sing and the band learned to play.
Both U2 and The Stones somehow, against all odds, manage to make stadium performances feel intimate. I never thought that would be possible. Twice I have seen Mick Jagger work the width and length of football fields without getting winded. In his late-50s. And so many people here swoon over Madonna doing four segments of aerobics with generous rest breaks while video segments are shown as part of the show. Yet people rave because she "looks great!" Sounds awful, especially without Donna De Lory singing her parts, but what can you do?
Twitter @NamoInExile
Instagram none
Updated On: 10/21/08 at 12:55 AM