In ice-hockey, the progression from regular play to a fixed-period of over-time play to an open-ended, game-deciding round is similar.
1. Regular play--you get a point whenever your team hits the puck into the opposing team's net.
2. If the score is tied at the end of regular play, there is a 5-minute "sudden-death" over-time period--anybody who gets their puck in their opponent's net scores a point and wins.
3. If the score is tied at the end of OT, there is a "shoot-out", in which individual players from each team are given the chance--1-on-1--to score against the opposing goal-tender. Each team gets 3 shots, unless it is mathematically impossible for the final shot to make a difference. Each time the puck goes into an opponent's net, his team gets a point.
4. If the score is STILL tied after 3 shoot-out rounds, the shoot-out format continues indefinitely, until someone scores.
What is different is that Hockey requires you to actually score more points--actually get your puck in the other team's net--in order to win.
I confess that "winning" without scoring more points is a concept I find troubling.
Not Ann Coulter-level troubling. I just need to get used to it.
You think, what do you want?
You think, make a decision...
Updated On: 6/30/14 at 05:26 PM