#1
Posted: 8/19/08 at 11:40pm
Hey all, ***spoilers may be included***
Just got back from the first preview of TOTC and thought I'd share some thoughts. From some word of mouth I went in expecting to see a total trainwreck, but I can't say that it was a trainwreck in the least. There are still many problems, but this is no Prince of Central Park or In My Life.
To start with a positive, I really liked the story. Dickens gave a lot of good material too work with (perhaps too much material for the author to handle). The plot moves along at such a breakneck speed that there is no time for character develop. How can so and so fall in love when they've had 2 minutes of stage time together? People die right and left, but without much effect on the audience.
Also the characters are fairly one-dimensional. Other than Sidney, James Barbour's character, everyone is either good or bad without much gray are in between.
The biggest problem I had though was with the score. It was very bland, generic and repetitive. The lyrics are as trite as can be and the melodies were often pretty but didn't soar enough to a climax. I often felt like I was listening to the cut songs from Jekyll and Hyde.
James was definitely the standout acting wise. He had managed to develop a character and found quite a bit of humor in his role. His voice was absolutely stunning, and a highlight of the show.
Aaron Lazar sounded great as well, but his character was so underdeveloped (by fault of the book) that he really didn't stand out.
I am in total agreement with WAT that someone needs to hunt down Christiane Noll and get her to replace Brandi immediately. She was the weak link acting wise of the love triangle, and I never really beloved that any of them were in love because of it.
I always took issue with the sets, which seem to be getting a bit of praise. The major problem was that there was no way to distinguish the scenes in London from the scenes in Paris. The sets needed to evoke the two different locations, and show a contrast between the two.
I didn't hate the show by any means, it just wasn't very exciting or moving theater. It's too bad, because with such rich characters and captivating story to work with, the final product was basically boring.
Just got back from the first preview of TOTC and thought I'd share some thoughts. From some word of mouth I went in expecting to see a total trainwreck, but I can't say that it was a trainwreck in the least. There are still many problems, but this is no Prince of Central Park or In My Life.
To start with a positive, I really liked the story. Dickens gave a lot of good material too work with (perhaps too much material for the author to handle). The plot moves along at such a breakneck speed that there is no time for character develop. How can so and so fall in love when they've had 2 minutes of stage time together? People die right and left, but without much effect on the audience.
Also the characters are fairly one-dimensional. Other than Sidney, James Barbour's character, everyone is either good or bad without much gray are in between.
The biggest problem I had though was with the score. It was very bland, generic and repetitive. The lyrics are as trite as can be and the melodies were often pretty but didn't soar enough to a climax. I often felt like I was listening to the cut songs from Jekyll and Hyde.
James was definitely the standout acting wise. He had managed to develop a character and found quite a bit of humor in his role. His voice was absolutely stunning, and a highlight of the show.
Aaron Lazar sounded great as well, but his character was so underdeveloped (by fault of the book) that he really didn't stand out.
I am in total agreement with WAT that someone needs to hunt down Christiane Noll and get her to replace Brandi immediately. She was the weak link acting wise of the love triangle, and I never really beloved that any of them were in love because of it.
I always took issue with the sets, which seem to be getting a bit of praise. The major problem was that there was no way to distinguish the scenes in London from the scenes in Paris. The sets needed to evoke the two different locations, and show a contrast between the two.
I didn't hate the show by any means, it just wasn't very exciting or moving theater. It's too bad, because with such rich characters and captivating story to work with, the final product was basically boring.
Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco.
Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!