Saw this at the ART on opening night. The physical production is astonishing. The script is okay, but perhaps too much on the nose and with a clumsy framing device. Biggest problem is that the performers are, by and large, only adequate, with a tendency to declaim line after line with the same affects. Right now, they don't give the play the extra shot it needs to make it memorable for something more than technically remarkable staging.
RippedMan said: "What production are you referring to?"
LateMan has posted in the Life of Pi sub, but this websites design makes it incredibly hard to notice it.
In our millions, in our billions, we are most powerful when we stand together. TW4C unwaveringly joins the worldwide masses, for we know our liberation is inseparably bound.
Signed,
Theater Workers for a Ceasefire
https://theaterworkersforaceasefire.com/statement
Watched the show today (matinee). Definitely the most complex staging I have ever seen at ART, though hopefully Broadway will be even more elaborate (storm effects especially, I would expect more on Broadway). Seemed less than the West End stage rig by pictures. But amazing.
Understudy for Pi, Uma Paranjpe. Can't say I've ever seen a main character swapped male for female between shows. It worked, she was very good, wish I knew how she compared to Adi Dixit.
Puppets were great. Just like War Horse, you forget about the puppeteers after a while.
An annoyance: digital program only and the site was crashed. My son saw 10+ people tryiing to access unsuccessfully. Wasn't working at intermission either. No easy access to wifi. No substitute for a real Playbill for the memory box. And masks still mandatory!!
Will be successful on Broadway. Will be successful on tour. Really checks all the boxes, I'm sure I'll see it again on tour in 2-3 years.
JESRhody said: "Understudy for Pi, Uma Paranjpe. Can't say I've ever seen a main character swapped male for female between shows. It worked, she was very good, wish I knew how she compared to Adi Dixit.
I find that annoying. If its a male character, it should be a male actor, and if it's a female character, it should be a female actor (trans actors notwithstanding). It's not like there's a lack of actors available for casting. There's not really any excuse. They clearly didn't want to pay for additional cast.
An annoyance: digital program only and the site was crashed. My son saw 10+ people tryiing to access unsuccessfully. Wasn't working at intermission either.
I wish this were true on Broadway. The amount of weekly paper waste is staggering. Maybe have a printed version for backup l Iike this, but certainly not as it is tiday.
No easy access to wifi. No substitute for a real Playbill for the memory
Playbills are magazines, whose primary purpose is to sell ad space. Playbills are meaningless.
Will be successful on Broadway. Will be successful on tour. Really checks all the boxes, I'm sure I'll see it again on tour in 2-3 years."
Well, it's currently not selling all that well. I'd be surprised if it runs past tge 6 months for which tickets are on sale.
Fosse76 said: Playbills are magazines, whose primary purpose is to sell ad space. Playbills are meaningless."
"Playbills are meaningless" is arguably one of the wildest takes I've read on this board.
I'm still bummed that ART's method of going paperless didn't allow me to have a Playbill for Wild, as I (and countless others) like to keep their Playbills as souvenirs.
I agree with the concept of reducing paper waste, but I would like the option: to have digital be the default, with printed copies available on request.
I was also there Saturday and saw it with Uma. Is Uma the only standby for Pi? I thought she was great and I wasn't bothered by the gender swap, but I'm curious why they decided to do it that way. I'm wondering if Uma is the actual standby or if perhaps some of their other cast members (including the usual standby) might have been ill or off for other reasons and she therefore had to step in.
LateMan said: "Saw this at the ART on opening night. The physical production is astonishing. The script is okay, but perhaps too much on the nose and with a clumsy framing device. Biggest problem is that the performers are, by and large, only adequate, with a tendency to declaim line after line with the same affects. Right now, they don't give the play the extra shot it needs to make it memorable for something more than technically remarkable staging."
Pretty much agree with your assessment, in addition to a framing device that is poorly executed, other non-boat scenes never gel dramatically or thematically - amateurish acting (don't know if cast changes in NY) but, oh that physical production - just incredible, deserving of all the praise and I'm sure it will be even more impressive on the NY stage. Having been a fan of the book and the movie, just wish the play rose to the same heights and brilliance of the stage design, music, puppetry, lighting etc.
Oh yeah, clearly some people in the audience were NOT familiar with the book or movie. I assume they saw puppetry was involved so thought this was Lion King-- and brought young children. Don't do that. - the play will go over their heads and possibly scare them. If you do bring them and they are unhappy, crying, talking please leave the theater so their displeasure does not distract others from the show.
forfivemoreminutes said: "I was also there Saturday and saw it with Uma. Is Uma the only standby for Pi? I thought she was great and I wasn't bothered by the gender swap, but I'm curious why they decided to do it that way. I'm wondering if Uma is the actual standby or if perhaps some of their other cast members (including the usual standby) might have been ill or off for other reasons and she therefore had to step in."
Both of the announced understudies are female. Curious if the second one has gotten any shows.