After Miss Julie Reviews — Page 2

Thank God it wasn't ALL pans...



AP is Positive

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/22/entertainment/e160044D23.DTL

Chicago Tribune is Positive

http://leisureblogs.chicagotribune.com/the_theater_loop/2009/10/after-miss-julie-on-broaway-sienna-miller-provokes-a-sexual-triangle-in-an-english-country-house.html

NY1 is Positive

http://ny1.com/9-staten-island-news-content/ny1_living/theater_reviews/


USA Today is Positive (*** out of 4)

http://www.usatoday.com/life/theater/reviews/2009-10-22-after-miss-julie_N.htm?csp=34


Backstage is Positive and has it as a Critic's Pick

http://www.backstage.com/bso/reviews-ny-theatre-broadway/ny-review-after-miss-julie-1004029701.story


there's hope bythesword84! :)

---

It makes me sad that so many people believe the critics without question. The play and the London production got fine reviews. Don't tell me some plays don't travel. A good play is a good play period. And if it isn't, then there's something the matter. If I want to see a Bdwy show I see it and make up my own mind. In general critics fall into two types. There is the critic who ponderously at length gives us his/her take on the show, as though the shows were put on just so we could read and discuss his/her review. Then there is the other kind who spends an inordinate amount of time outlining the plot but fills in with sarcastic comments that he/she believes make the column witty and enjoyaable but in the end are just boringly annoying. If there is a critic out there who doesn't subscribe to either of these schools of criticism, one whom I can respect, please let me know. I do believe NYC Bdwy critics have a lot to answer for.

Oh, and the reliable David Cote from Time Out NY gave it a rave.
TONY review

---