I saw both versions over the past 2 nites (I've been excited about this for WEEKS)
And I've been trying to decide ever since which combo I liked better
I preferred Cumberbatch as the creature, definitely. His creature was more awkward and halting, while I thought Miller's was more self-righteous, and moved like a dancer
Their Frankensteins were very different -- Miller's was very haughty and disdainful, like he 'got' other people but just didn't care. Cumberbatch's was more like the 'science geek' -- uncertain socially, but lighting up whenever there were scientific challenges. He was in his own world, more human, more vulnerable
One thought -- there was a scene with Cumberbatch as the creature where I felt like I was watching Ralph Fiennes (I guess cuz of the makeup for the creature and Voldermort?) -- even the VOICE and inflection and diction. It was weird
I think one thing I decided -- I didn't *LIKE* either character when played by Miller (didn't feel sympathy for them), while I DID 'like' both characters when played by Cumberbatch
I guess I preferred the version with Cumberbatch as the creature, because caring about that character was a richer experience (for me anyway)
To me it's just FASCINATING how switching the characters like that makes such a change in the feel of the whole story
You don't go to the dragon without a present - Mark Rylance