Better to know show or not when seeing it? — Page 2

Going in blind can be fun, but the internet in general and this site in particular make it hard to do that for me anymore. I'm just too curious about all the details about a show that I can find out before I see it. The one show that I did recently somehow avoid all details of besides the basic stuff was August: Osage County. I remained unaware of any spoilers all the way through the Broadway run and was floored by it when I saw it on tour. I'm glad I was able to do that, but it doesn't happen for me for most shows.

---

I think it depends on; how patient you are, your taste, the hype the show has had and the expectations you walk in seeing it.
I saw August Osage County not know much about it and it blew me away.
" " Wicked knowing almost all of it and I was still stunned
" " Spring Awakening, knowing nothing and feeling underwhelmed

I prefer to know nothing --- or, to be precise, a bit less than nothing. Just the basics of the play, and perhaps a very broad overview of the story (but not the ending). For example, the recent posts on "Book of Mormon": I know that only described the first 25 minutes of the show, but I read just the first bit of what was in the link, not even the entire thing.

The only exceptions I can think of off-hand are two: The first was [title of show]. I am glad I did on that one, because understanding where the play came from and how it evolved helped make all the self-referencing stuff that much more enjoyable. The other example is "The Merchant of Venice". I'd read it in high school, and remembered it very generally, but the language can make things difficult, so a couple days before seeing the current version on Broadway, I went online and read an overview of the entire story, to make sure that I got it all when I watched it. (As it turns out, the Playbill already had an overview in it, but I didn't know that.)

But, as a rule of thumb, I prefer to know very little about a play going into it.