Jolie is still considered a beauty, without a doubt. So is Catherine Zeta-Jones, still my first choice for the part. She can be ravishing and also capture the dark side of the character. She could be frightening as well as frighteningly beautiful in the part.
As for Tilda, I do think she's fascinating-looking. She has one of those faces that can either be beautiful or rather ugly. Catch her in the wrong light or at the wrong angle, and she looks like Jeffrey Jones's twin sister. Catch her in the right light, and she can take your breath away (in a good way). Angelica Huston is like that. So is Toni Collette. So was Katharine Hepburn, for that matter. Personally, those faces are far more interesting to me as actresses.
But I would cast someone that "the world at large" (whatever that means, but actually you KNOW exactly what that means) finds beautiful. Jolie, Kidman (before her wax lips), Zeta-Jones, etc. Not cookie-cutter Barbie looks, but "world renowned beauties," just the same. If it weren't a major plot point, I don't think it would be as important to find a "world renowned beauty."
As for the stage actresses, you have a different hurdle there. You need a star ... who can sing ... and is beautiful "enough" to play the part.
This ain't the stage any more. It's funny you can't see outside of the stage casting as far as children go and as far as the beauty being parts of the script. You think I'm confined in my thinking, but that's exactly what you are now. Confined to the limitations and conventions of the previous stage casts.
It's a movie now. The thought process will be very different.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 1/13/12 at 01:34 PM