#51
Posted: 9/3/03 at 8:20am
So far Michael Ball hasn't been asked and I wonder how certain this production is to transfer on Broadway.
Ticket sales are not good in London, down to half empty stalls mid week even before Michael left the show. Now best seats are left even on Saturday nights. Possibly the problem is the very nature of the show? This is not a "Les Mis" that the wider public will go to see over and over. The tunes are catchy but very much for kids.
Also further script changes have brought the production even closer to a British pantomime than it was before. The comedy borders on slapstick. It might even be stretching things to term it as a "musical". It really is a West End Panto...the sort of show that takes place on a smaller scale in towns all over Britain each Christmas and relies on tired jokes, chirpy characters and a well known star to sing it's Toot Sweet Tunes. (Pantomime as a theatre form isn't respected exactly!) In Chitty, the star is the car. People go to see it fly. But can an "effect" carry a show on Broadway?
In the beginning, Chitty with it's original cast was stronger than it's become now. Changes have weakened the script, emphasised the farce and some recent cast changes haven't worked well. Michael Ball did have a superb voice and while his acting was less than convincing in Preview, it did improve greatly over the run. But when it comes to Broadway, his name is not well known by the wider US public and this show needs a star who will carry it and pull in those crowds. Otherwise you're down to buying tickets to see a car fly. Will that make a show a success on Broadway?
Ticket sales are not good in London, down to half empty stalls mid week even before Michael left the show. Now best seats are left even on Saturday nights. Possibly the problem is the very nature of the show? This is not a "Les Mis" that the wider public will go to see over and over. The tunes are catchy but very much for kids.
Also further script changes have brought the production even closer to a British pantomime than it was before. The comedy borders on slapstick. It might even be stretching things to term it as a "musical". It really is a West End Panto...the sort of show that takes place on a smaller scale in towns all over Britain each Christmas and relies on tired jokes, chirpy characters and a well known star to sing it's Toot Sweet Tunes. (Pantomime as a theatre form isn't respected exactly!) In Chitty, the star is the car. People go to see it fly. But can an "effect" carry a show on Broadway?
In the beginning, Chitty with it's original cast was stronger than it's become now. Changes have weakened the script, emphasised the farce and some recent cast changes haven't worked well. Michael Ball did have a superb voice and while his acting was less than convincing in Preview, it did improve greatly over the run. But when it comes to Broadway, his name is not well known by the wider US public and this show needs a star who will carry it and pull in those crowds. Otherwise you're down to buying tickets to see a car fly. Will that make a show a success on Broadway?